Tuesday, February 28, 2017

Conspiracies Undermining Trump

Sent by Tony Newbill
Edited by John R. Houk
© February 28, 2017

Pseudonymous contributor Tony Newbill looks at Obama disruption of the Trump Administration, tax reform concepts, food availability, policing for profit, Censoring News under the Fake News moniker, human gene manipulation, Intelligence monitoring of communications of government employees and private citizens, Special Prosecutor of Crooked Hillary more important looking at Trump involvement with Russia AND nefarious cooperation between Bezos-owned WaPo and the CIA.

JRH 2/28/17
Timeline Strongly Suggests President Obama Set Up Intelligence Scheme
2/17/2017 10:21 AM

The Lame Duck Timeline Strongly Suggests President Obama Set Up Intelligence Scheme To Undermine Trump

Jay Sekulow outlines the case (Video Here [** Youtube Version Below]) that President Obama set-up a plan for the intelligence community to target President Trump.

Posted by Prissy Holly
Published on Feb 17, 2017

This is Interesting ...The Tax Revolution Is Here
2/20/2017 9:28 AM

One year after it launched, the Tax Revolution Institute — true to its name — is radically distinguishing itself from other organizations in the tax-reform space. TRI’s claim is that the fundamental problem with our tax system is not that it isn’t flat enough, fair enough, low enough, or simple enough — but the simple fact that the government does not have to earn our money.

The Problem
Our tax system guarantees politicians an uninterrupted stream of revenue, regardless of whether it is spent honestly, wisely, or effectively. This creates an environment of weak accountability and a lack of responsiveness to the impact of government spending on people’s lives.

The Solution
What if the government had to earn our money?

In other words, what if individuals could redirect their tax dollars whenever they saw them spent wastefully, corruptly, or in ways that just don’t have a positive impact on people’s lives? What if Americans could maximize the good that government does by effectively voting with every tax dollar?

Public Support for Voluntary Taxation on the Rise
Could society be changed for the better if the public were allowed to redirect their tax dollars to civil society instead of the government? TRI Videographer Ford Fischer walks the streets of Washington, DC, to see what the average person has to say.

READ ENTIRETY: (Public Support for Voluntary Taxation on the Rise; By Ford Fischer; Tax Revolution Institution; 2/17/17)

Ending Hunger in America One College “Food Pantry” at a Time
The story of Justin Franks's food pantry is a compelling reminder of the power of individuals when they freely come together to find societal solutions. Franks shares his experience with TRI in this one-on-one interview.

READ ENTIRETY: (Ending Hunger in America One College “Food Pantry” at a Time; By Guillermo Jimenez; Tax Revolution Institution; 2/17/17)

Civil Asset Forfeiture: Why Ending an Economic Incentive Can Change Policing for the Better

The entire country, including the police, would do well to see an end to the perverse economic incentives created by civil asset forfeiture. TRI's Editor in Chief, Guillermo Jimenez, breaks down the ugly history of "policing for profit" and explains why the public must demand its abolishment.

READ ENTIRETY: (Civil Asset Forfeiture: Why Ending an Economic Incentive Can Change Policing for the Better; By Guillermo Jimenez; Tax Revolution Institution; 2/17/17)

2/22/2017 11:00 PM

Breaking: Infowars and Natural News under attack

Alex Jones’ and Mike Adams’ are both under attack.

Infowars has been dropped by its ad platform provider —, which spreads ads for Infowars products to many, many media outlets. Last year, that ad operation accounted for more than $3 million in sales for Infowars.

Natural News has been “delisted” by Google. Google appears to have wiped out 140,000 pages of listings for Mike’s website. I just typed in “natural news” at Google and what came up was something different, — another tiny site owned by Mike, not, as the top listing.

The Empire is striking back. This isn’t debate or discussion or even baseless accusation. This is war by attrition. And censorship.

This is part of the elite mantra: if we don’t like it, wipe it out.

If you’ve been awake for the past year, you’ve seen an escalation, along many fronts, of the so-called “Progressive” forces to censor what they don’t want to read or hear.

It’s taken a new turn. They want to take down key independent media outlets.

They want to narrow down the “information superhighway” to a one-lane road that runs directly into their headquarters, where all the big-time fake news is dispensed, every day, to the hypnotized masses.

Don’t let them win. At the very least, take the independent news you judge is vitally important and spread it out far and wide.
Finally, for now, a message to those individuals who, by work and sweat and intelligence, by their own efforts, have built and created independent news sites:


Update: Part-2 here (Breaking: Infowars and Natural News under attack; By Jon Rappoport; Jon Rappoport’s Blog; 2/22/17)

Genetic manipulation of humans: Jeff Rense and Jon Rappoport

(Update: Part-1 here, Part-2 here)

Listen to a brand new conversation between Jeff Rense and Jon Rappoport, on the subject of new vaccines that will permanently change the DNA of humans. This is vital information.

Posted by Jeff Rense
Published on Feb 22, 2017

The next gen of vaccine horror is here. You better pay EXTREMELY close attention to this conversation.

'Science' has announced that vaccines are moving away from traditional formats and will now be composed of viruses that will carry entirely new forms of DNA right into your cells where they will REPLACE or join your body's existing, God-given NATURAL DNA with this new SYNTHETIC DNA. This new DNA will allegedly confirm protection on you from various viruses that each new DNA type is created to kill. However, this new virus-delivered SYNTHETIC DNA can be created to do almost ANYTHING to youpermanently and forever. This fake DNA can CHANGE ANY PART OF YOUR BEINGfrom intellectual and emotional processes to all physical traits that are created and regulated by our natural DNA. We are entirely governed by our birth DNA but soon, according to one scientist, 'EVERYONE WILL HAVE SYNTHETIC DNA.' We are talking about ABSOLUTE CONTROL of the human species through synthetic, DNA. This is a monumentally important video.

Deep State ... can President Trump rebalance Liberty?
2/23/2017 10:09 AM

The surveillance state regime today permits America’s 60,000 military and civilian domestic spies to access in real time all the landline and mobile telephone calls and all the desktop and mobile device keystrokes and all the digital data created and used by anyone in the United States. The targets today are not just ordinary Americans; they are justices on the Supreme Court, military brass in the Pentagon, agents in the FBI, local police in cities and towns, and the man in the Oval Office.

READ ENTIRETY (The chickens have come home to roost; By Judge Andrew P. Napolitano; Fox News; 2/23/17)

Where’s Crooked Hillary’s Special Prosecutor?
2/27/2017 10:57 PM

Where the Hell is the Special Prosecutor for Hillary Clinton giving Russia US Technology for donations to the Clinton Foundation??????? [Among other dastardly deeds]

Four Times When Hillary Clinton And Her Allies Sold Out American Interests To Putin In Exchange For Political And Financial Favors

Clinton Sold Out American Military Technology To Putin As Secretary Of State In Exchange For Russian Money For Her Foundation:

Clinton “Worked Aggressively” To Lure Large American Technology Companies To Invest In Russian Firms Based In Skolkovo. “Consider Skolkovo, an ‘innovation city’ of 30,000 people on the outskirts of Moscow, billed as Russia’s version of Silicon Valley—and a core piece of Mrs. Clinton’s quarterbacking of the Russian reset. Mrs. Clintons State Department worked aggressively to attract U.S. investment partners and helped the Russian State Investment Fund, Rusnano, identify American tech companies worthy of Russian investment.” (Peter Schweizer, “The Clinton Foundation, State And Kremlin Connections,” The Wall Street Journal, 7/31/16)

U.S. Military Experts Believe These Skolkovo-Based Companies Serve As Vehicles To Expand Russia’s Military Capacity. “Amid all the sloshing of Russia rubles and American dollars, however, the state-of-the-art technological research coming out of Skolkovo raised  officials. Research conducted in 2012 on Skolkovo by the U.S. Army Foreign Military Studies Program at Fort Leavenworth declared that the purpose of Skolkovo was to serve as a ‘vehicle for world-wide technology transfer to Russia in the areas of information technology, biomedicine, energy, satellite and space technology, and nuclear technology.’”(Peter Schweizer, “The Clinton Foundation, State And Kremlin Connections,” The Wall Street Journal, 7/31/16)

The Clinton’s Family Foundation Has Received An Influx Of Funds From Russian Companies Tied To Skolkovo. “Russians tied to Skolkovo also flowed funds to the Clinton Foundation. Andrey Vavilov, the chairman of SuperOx, which is part of Skolkovo’s nuclear-research cluster, donated between $10,000 and $25,000 (donations are reported in ranges, not exact amounts) to the Clinton’s family charity. Skolkovo Foundation chief and billionaire Putin confidant Viktor Vekselberg also gave to the Clinton Foundation through READ THE REST (CLINTON’S CLOSE TIES TO PUTIN DESERVE SCRUTINY; Press Release;; 10/9/16)

Washington Post-CIA marriage
2/28/2017 9:21 AM

The Post is in bed with the CIA to the tune of $600 million. If that isn’t the foundation of fakery on a grand scale, what is?

Try to find one major news outlet that has exposed and pounded on this Washington Post-CIA marriage. You can’t. You see, the fakers protect their own. It’s a club. If you join, you keep your mouth shut about the inherent unholy alliances within the club. It’s a rule.

Memo to the New York Times, LA Times, CNN, FOX, NBC, CBS, ABC, BBC, Reuters, AP: If you want to prove you’re not fake, go after the Washington Post, hammer and tongs, on their marriage to the CIA. Don’t let up. Demand conflict of interest statements from the Post, for starters.

And here’s a talking point for you. Was Jeff Bezos’ cash purchase of the Washington Post a mere coincidence, placed next to his $600 million contract with the CIA, or did he buy the Post so he could offer the CIA an even tighter relationship with the number-one paper of record?

[Blog Editor: The above Rappoport link is actually a link to the Trump Press Release talking Hillary’s crooked dealings with Russia under the pseudonym “Tommy Tunes” which is the same as Tony Newbill pseudonym. Part or all of the above text is excerpted from the Rappoport link. Here is an excerpt from the Rappoport link which I think draws a better picture referring to the Bezos-WaPo/CIA marriage.]

Here are key statements from Norman Solomon’s AlterNet article about the Washington Post, its owner, Jeff Bezos, and the CIA (12/18/13):

“The Post’s new owner, Jeff Bezos, is the founder and CEO of Amazon — which recently landed a $600 million contract with the CIA. But the Post’s articles about the CIA are not disclosing that the newspaper’s sole owner is the main owner of CIA business partner Amazon.”

“Even for a multi-billionaire like Bezos, a $600 million contract is a big deal. That’s more than twice as much as Bezos paid to buy the Post four months ago.”

“And there’s likely to be plenty more where that CIA largesse came from. Amazon’s offer wasn’t the low bid, but it won the CIA contract anyway by offering advanced high-tech ‘cloud’ infrastructure.”

“Bezos personally and publicly touts Amazon Web Services, and it’s evident that Amazon will be seeking more CIA contracts. Last month, Amazon issued a statement saying, ‘We look forward to a successful relationship with the CIA’.”

“As Amazon’s majority owner and the Post’s only owner, Bezos stands to gain a lot more if his newspaper does less ruffling and more soothing of CIA feathers.”

And here’s a talking point for you. Was Jeff Bezos’ cash purchase of the Washington Post a mere coincidence, placed next to his $600 million contract with the CIA, or did he buy the Post so he could offer the CIA an even tighter relationship with the number-one paper of record?

Get it? Or am I going too fast for you? -READ ENTIRETY (Washington Post: fake-news partner with the CIA; By Jon Rappoport; Jon Rappoport’s Blog; 2/28/17)

Edited by John R. Houk
Text enclosed by brackets are by the Editor.
All photos placed by the Editor. They are not related to the original excerpt.

© Tony Newbill


Pizzagate: Fake News, Real News or Disinformation News

John R. Houk
© February 28, 2017

The Pizzagate scandal/conspiracy was connected to the Wikileaks release of emails surrounding the Democratic Party and some perhaps coded words that may finger a pedophile ring in John Podesta’s emails.

The Left Stream Media and accredited Conservative media outlets have pretty much dismissed Pizzagate as Fake News.

On a personal level, anything to do with Crooked Hillary, Barack Obama and the Democratic Party is corrupt and/or nefarious. It is a certain fact that the big dogs of the Dem elite are liars. Regardless of the proof the Left oriented MSM refuses to call the Dems out on the lies. Rather the lies are pooh-poohed and diminished to the public and the Dem faithful voters toe the line on ignoring the Dem lies.

Thus my reaction to “Pizzagate” being Fake News jumps to suspicion.

Since I have a distrust when the Left says “Fake News,” then I lean to believe there is at least some truth involved. With that in mind here is a Freedom Outpost article on Pizzagate about a Pizzagate investigator that has had his investigative videos removed by the Youtube censors.

JRH 2/28/17
Hundreds of Videos Disappear from YouTube Channel of #Pizzagate Journalist

FEBRUARY 27, 2017

David Seaman, a journalist who investigated Pizzagate and had made hundreds of videos, is now without any videos on his YouTube channel.

Seaman, who has 154,156 subscribers, made many videos exposing the Pizzagate scandal, which is about a pedophile ring centered in Washington, DC.

So far, there has been no word as to why the videos have been removed from his channel.  His account also displays no videos.

One video does appear in the "videos" section of his channel.  That video was posted by Based Patriot.  The title is "President Trump Holds Anti-Human Trafficking Meeting," and was published on February 23.

Posted by Based Patriot
Published on Feb 23, 2017

In that video, Trump said that his administration would "focus on ending the absolutely horrific practice of human trafficking."

Initially, internet sleuths set out researching the Podesta emails to prove a pedophilia connection between convicted sex offender, Jeffery Epstein, and the Clintons. Bill Clinton is known to have traveled on Epstein’s private jet, nicknamed the “Lolita Express,” without Secret Service protection on numerous occasions – a seemingly suspicious move given Epstein’s proclivity for sex with underage girls.

While there was never any “smoking gun” found regarding Epstein and the Clintons, the “Pizzagate” subreddit began after the strange use of code words was discovered in use in the Podesta emails, which were released by WikiLeaks. There is no mistaking the use of coded messages within the Podesta emails, but their meaning remains speculative.

One of Hillary Clinton's cronies recently said that that takedown of former national security adviser Michael Flynn was "revenge for Pizzagate."  Some have even theorized that Andrew Breitbart may have been murdered over the Pizzagate scandal.

Interestingly enough, CBS investigative journalist Ben Swann's Pizzagate video has disappeared from Facebook.

Attempts to contact Mr. Seaman failed.  Are these things being scrubbed from the internet Orwell style or did Seaman remove them on his own?

Pizzagate: Fake News, Real News or Disinformation News
John R. Houk
© February 28, 2017
Hundreds of Videos Disappear from YouTube Channel of #Pizzagate Journalist

About Tim Brown
Tim Brown is an author and Editor at and He is husband to his "more precious than rubies" wife, father of 10 "mighty arrows", jack of all trades, Christian and lover of liberty. He resides in the U.S. occupied Great State of South Carolina. Tim is also an affiliate for the Joshua Mark 5 AR/AK hybrid semi-automatic rifle. Follow Tim on Twitter.

Monday, February 27, 2017

Clair Lopez at CPAC: Civilization Jihad and ...

Clair Lopez educated listeners about the reality of Islamic Civilization Jihad in action against the USA and Canada at CPAC.

JRH 2/27/17
Clair Lopez at CPAC: Civilization Jihad and the Muslim Brotherhood in the USA and Canada

By Baron Bodissey
Originally Gates of Vienna
February 26, 2017

Clare M. Lopez is a strategic policy and intelligence expert who focuses on national defense, Islam, Iran, and counterterrorism issues. She is a former career operations officer with the Central Intelligence Agency, and is now a Senior Fellow at the Center for Security Policy.

Ms. Lopez spoke at a CPAC event on Thursday. Below is a video of the brief talk she gave about stealth Islamization and sharia in North America:

Published on Feb 23, 2017

About The Counter Jihad Report

There is an urgent need for the public to become informed about the Global Islamic Jihad Movement. We must demand from our leaders that they become familiar with Islamic Law and jihadist ideology so that our counterterrorism policies can better protect us from this growing threat.

This blog is mainly a news aggregating site but also includes an extensive library of resources for studying Islam and networking with other Counter Jihad activists. My goal has been to pull from a variety of the most trusted and reliable sources to educate the public on the counter jihad movement. The many RSS feeds and counterjihad twitter feed in the sidebar are meant to provide a time saving jumping off point to access all the headlines and breaking news.

My Interest in Islamic Jihad stems from the 1983 Hezbollah truck bombing of the U.S. Embassy in Beirut in which my cousin, Ken Haas, was killed. Ken left a career as a philosophy professor to work for the CIA and was the Station Chief in Beirut. He and his wife of one year had just finished lunch in Ken’s office at the Embassy and kissed good-bye. She had driven back to their apartment where she heard the explosion. After several agonizing days READ THE REST

Saturday, February 25, 2017

ACLJ Requests Records from DOJ and Intelligence Agencies ...

Even the American Center for Law and Justice (ACLJ) is sensing the existence of a Shadow Government within the American government. The shadow is being cast from the Leftist Democratic Party.

JRH 2/25/17
ACLJ Requests Records from DOJ and Intelligence Agencies on Obama Administration’s Last Minute Expansion of Access to Intelligence Information

February 24, 2017

Today we delivered Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) requests to the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ), the Office of the Director of National Security (ODNI), and the National Security Agency (NSA) to find out why the Obama Administration waited until mere days before a new Administration took over to implement a significant change in intelligence policy.

As we’ve stated before, this significant policy change appears to have a direct correlation to the exponentially increased number of intel leaks the Trump Administration has been dealing with.

By greatly expanding access to classified information by unelected, unaccountable bureaucrats, the Obama Administration paved the way for a shadow government to leak that classified information, endangering our national security, in an attempt to undermine President Trump.

While sharing information among intelligence agencies is not a new concept, and this isn’t the first time an Administration has made amendments to intelligence policy, the timing is suspect.

According to the New York Times, “[i]n its final days, the Obama administration has expanded the power of the National Security Agency to share globally intercepted personal communications with the government’s 16 other intelligence agencies before applying privacy protections.” On December 15, 2016, Director of National Intelligence James Clapper executed a document entitled “Procedures for the Availability or Dissemination of Raw Signals Intelligence Information by the National Security Agency Under Section 2.3 of Executive Order 12333.” In turn, on January 3, 2017, then-Attorney General Lynch approved these new procedures.

The significance of the Obama Administration’s new rules is a relaxation of previously established “limits on what the N.S.A. may do with information gathered by its most powerful surveillance operations.” What is also not clear, and what the ACLJ seeks to determine through its FOIA request, is why, after having the opportunity to expand the policy during its 8 years in power, the Obama Administration waited to change the policy just days before a new administration was set to begin.

Even the ACLU called this an "erosion of rules intended to protect the privacy of Americans."

We submitted our FOIA requests so that we can get to the bottom of this significant intelligence policy change and expose whether this last minute move of an outgoing Administration was meant to facilitate leaks detrimental to the incoming President – by dramatically expanding the raw information that career intelligence agency employees can access.

Among other things, our FOIAs request any records or communications among and between government agencies and officials

referencing, connected to, or regarding in any way their approval of the procedures set forth in the document entitled “Procedures for the Availability or Dissemination of Raw Signals Intelligence Information by the National Security Agency Under Section 2.3 of Executive Order 12333,” which Director of National Intelligence Clapper executed on December 15, 2016, and which then-Attorney General Lynch approved on January 3, 2017.

The American people deserve to know the truth about how their government operates and the true reasons for the decisions it makes.

We will hold our government accountable by obtaining and examining authentic and authoritative sources for what actually happened, who was involved, and the reasons underlying these governmental activities.


American Center for Law and Justice | Washington D.C. | Copyright © 2017, ACLJ

The ACLJ is an organization dedicated to the defense of constitutional liberties secured by law.

American Center for Law and Justice is a d/b/a for Christian Advocates Serving Evangelism, Inc., a tax-exempt, not-for-profit, religious corporation as defined under Section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code, specifically dedicated to the ideal that religious freedom and freedom of speech are inalienable, God-given rights. The Center's purpose is to engage legal, legislative and cultural issues by implementing an effective strategy of advocacy, education and litigation to ensure that those rights are protected under the law. The organization has participated in numerous cases before the Supreme Court, Federal Court of Appeals, Federal District Courts, and various state courts regarding freedom of religion and freedom of speech. Your gift is very much appreciated and fully deductible as a charitable contribution. A copy of our latest financial report may be obtained by writing to us at P.O. Box 90555, Washington, DC 20090-0555.

Guess Who Just Got BUSTED As Russian Agents? ...

A Lisa Haven video believes it has the documentation that shows the Dems as the Russian agents interfering in America and NOT President Donald Trump. AND check this out! Senator John McCain solicited donations from Russians – more proof of McCain the RINO.

THE suggestion (and a pretty good one) is the Dems and Establishment RINOs are the true subversives of America.

JRH 2/25/17

Posted by Lisa Haven
Published on Feb 22, 2017

Here's the link that goes with the video:
Get The Tea:
Need Food Storage:

(CODE- HAVEN for $20 Off)
For More Information on READ THE REST

Friday, February 24, 2017

EXPOSED - New documentary reveals top Democrats collaboration with Muslim Brotherhood

WND sent a promotional email focusing on the documentary “The Enemies Within”. The promotional bundles the documentary and two books: See Something, Say Nothing (Hardcover), and Stealth Invasion (Hardcover) by Philip Haney.

I am not a WND salesman however every so a WND promotion arrives in which the description in itself is informative. This one of those cases. The bundle relates to the government conspiracy under Obama’s Manchurian Candidate Administration how Marxism and Jihadi Muslims team up to take down the American nation and culture down from within.

JRH 2/24/17
EXPOSED - New documentary reveals top Democrats collaboration with Muslim Brotherhood
Founding member of Department Homeland Security warns ties 'deeper, broader, wider' than Huma Abedin's

Sent by WND
Sent February 23, 2017 at 9:00 AM

A blockbuster new documentary asserts there is a master plan to create a permanent liberal majority in American by flooding it with millions of voters hostile to conservatism.

But "The Enemies Within" also claims forces dedicated to the destruction of this country have even penetrated the national security bureaucracy, endangering Americans and the entire system of constitutional government.

Key to this case is the testimony of Philip Haney, a founding member of the Department of Homeland Security and a counter-terrorism analyst who was widely praised and commended by his superiors throughout his distinguished career.

By accumulating vast amounts of data and examining the relationships between various extremist groups and their sources of funding, Haney had identified dozens of terrorists throughout the years, arguably preventing numerous attacks.

However, in 2009, it was Haney himself who was targeted by his own government. He tells his story in the book "See Something, Say Nothing," but his story is also the most powerful part of "The Enemies Within."

He recounts in "The Enemies Within:" "I finished a case up, I put it in the system. There were 67 records related to the case, individuals and organizations. But then about two weeks after I put the case into the system, I went on vacation and received a call from my colleague. He said they had removed the records from the system. They didn't just modify them, they completely obliterated them, took all of them out."

Haney argues this dramatic action had devastating consequences for the American people. The specific records the government deleted turned out to be directly relevant to terrorist attacks that took place later.

"Those are the records related to the network of mosques and organizations operating in the United States that is linked to the San Bernardino shooting and to the Orlando shooting," he recalled.

Indeed, Haney states in the video the federal government not only removed the records but actually investigated him for simply doing his job. "They said essentially that I did not have the authority to put those records into the system, even though I had been commended by the National Targeting Center for finding 300 terrorists," Haney says in the film. "So, essentially, the last three years of my career, I was under investigation by three different government agencies, all at the same time. They essentially determined that I was more of a threat than these terrorist groups."

Shockingly, the distinguished counter-terrorism expert says no one in the federal government ever claimed his records were inaccurate or untrue. The facts, he claims, were beyond dispute. Instead, for no good reason he can identify, his work was eliminated and he was disgraced.

In one of the most dramatic moments of the film, Haney describes his reaction as feeling "infuriated and stripped naked." He describes the painful experience as a "public humiliation."

"To sequester me in a small room for the last 11 months of my career with no assigned duties and then have the audacity to say those were not adverse actions because 'we're just conducting an investigation," Haney remembers. "It's cruel to do that to a person. It wasn't a moral infraction, it wasn't refusal to obey orders, it wasn't some crime that I committed. It was simply doing the job that I took a vow to do and had been recognized and awarded for."

For that reason, Haney emphatically states in the documentary the United States has enemies within its own government.

Distinguished author and researcher Trevor Loudon describes the terrifying full extent of this hostile network operating within America's own borders in "The Enemies Within," detailing an alliance between radical Marxists and Islamic extremists that has penetrated the very highest levels of the federal government. As Haney explains in the film, the problem has gotten so bad, many of America's politicians and policy makers would not be able to pass the kind of basic security checks required of even entry level employees.

"If you have overt ties to associations with known associations with terrorism, you cannot pass a background check," Haney says in the film.

He describes Hillary Clinton as a "domestic threat" and details the deep connections between the former Democratic presidential nominee and secretary of state with some of the most dangerous Islamic movements in the world. They even go beyond her close relationship with longtime aide and confidante Huma Abedin.

The most dangerous enemy is the one who operates from within your own gates. Discover the traitors within our own country and help spread the word about how America is already under attack. Don't miss “The Enemies Within" available now in the WND Superstore. "Hillary Clinton's ties are a lot deeper, broader and wider than Huma Abedin," Haney says. "The best example of her ties is her affiliation with the Istanbul Process and, in particular, with U.N. Resolution 1618. That resolution, it essentially criminalizes defamation of Islam, has been backed for 10 years by the Organization of the Islamic Conference, a 57-nation organization. It is essentially run in its leadership positions by members of the Muslim Brotherhood. By endorsing U.N. Resolution 16/18, by default Hillary Clinton is aiding and abetting the Muslim Brotherhood on a macro, global level." And the Muslim Brotherhood, in Haney's opinion as a national security professional, is directly responsible for sponsoring terrorism. He argues in "The Enemies Within" the organization should be labeled a terrorist group and shut down.

"Since we already know that Muslim Brotherhood is the parent of Hamas and that these organizations are overtly supporting Hamas and other like-minded organizations around the world then we should shut those organizations," he declares in the film. "And that would send a shockwave throughout the pro-Shariah, pro-jihadist Islamic world without firing a single shot or dropping a bomb anywhere in the world."

Until that happens, Haney argues, national security professionals have been "completely blindfolded and handcuffed." "We can't use the most basic fundamental language that they themselves use to help us understand what Islam believes and what its intentions are," he explains in the movie.

"The Enemies Within" doesn't just analyze radical Islam. Instead, it details the terrifying extent to which far left radicals who have overtly declared their anti-American intentions are taking control of the very institutions meant to protect Americans.

At a time when the mainstream media is suddenly concerned about supposed Russian interference, "The Enemies Within" shows the rot set in much sooner than the last election cycle and involves hostile foreign actors more malevolent than Vladimir Putin.

"Those of us who took our oath [seriously] are being betrayed," Haney says of his fellow national security professionals in the film. "Things like that which happened to me will happen more and more often because people will be forced to stand up for the law at the risk of their career and maybe even their life."

At a time of crisis, remaining uninformed isn't just dangerous, it's deadly. "The Enemies Within" is the first step to recognizing where the threat is coming from.

The most dangerous enemy is the one who operates from within your own gates. Discover the traitors within our own country and help spread the word about how America is already under attack. Don't miss "The Enemies Within" available now in the WND Superstore.
Blog Editor: I found a Youtube video that bills itself as the documentary “The Enemies Within”. The video is narrated by Trevor Loudon as the first WND link in the promotion. However, the length  of the video is 5:41:39. That seems a bit lengthy to me thus I am unsure if it is the same documentary promoted by the WND Superstore.

Posted by 2414985
Published on Dec 23, 2016

No Description
Call Toll-Free to Order:

If you prefer to order by phone, you can call our friendly, Midwestern customer service reps toll-free at 1-800-4WND-COM 
Monday-Friday, 9am-5pm Central.

WND | 2020 Pennsylvania Ave NW, #351 | Washington, DC 20006

Copyright 1997-2017 Inc. All Rights Reserved.

Thursday, February 23, 2017

Leftist Indivisible is NOT American Indivisible

John R. Houk
© February 23, 2017

What is the definition of indivisible?

American Heritage Dictionary via

1. Incapable of undergoing division.

2. Mathematics Incapable of being divided without a remainder: The number15 is indivisible by 7.

The Patriotism of the word indivisible:

I pledge allegiance to the Flag,
of the United States of America
and to the Republic for which it stands,
One Nation, under God
Indivisible, with Liberty and Justice for All.

The notion behind The Pledge I’d like to point to is this: America is ONE nation as in ONE culture with parts that cannot undergo division as long as Liberty and Justice is insured to ALL.

The essence of “indivisible” for Americans is wrapped in the American concept Liberty and Justice. The true “American” concept is vastly different than the American Left’s concept of Liberty and Justice.


Liberty and virtue are not a likely pair. At first sight they seem to be contraries, for liberty appears to mean living as you please and virtue appears to mean living not as you please but as you ought. It doesn’t seem likely that a society dedicated to liberty could make much of virtue, nor that one resolved to have virtue could pride itself on liberty. Yet liberty and virtue also seem necessary to each other. A free people, with greater opportunity to misbehave than a people in shackles, needs the guidance of an inner force to replace the lack of external restraint. And virtue cannot come from within, or truly be virtue, unless it is voluntary and people are free to choose it. Americans are, and think themselves to be, a free people first of all. Whatever virtue they have, and however much, is a counterpoint to the theme of liberty. But how do they manage to make virtue and liberty harmonious? (Liberty and Virtue in the American Founding; By Harvey C. Mansfield;

See Also:

Concept of Liberty; By Dictionary of American History;; 2003)


The philosophy of John Locke was a major influence on America’s Founding Fathers (SEE ALSO: John Locke – A Philosophical Founder of America; WallBuilders; 12/29/16). The influence of Locke’s concept of Natural Law is embodied in these two paragraphs:

In short, according to Cicero, the only intelligent approach to government, justice and human relations is in terms of the laws which the Supreme Creator had already established. The Founders took from Cicero an idea that was revolutionary in terms of a governing a body and that idea was that the glue which binds human beings together in any commonwealth of a just society is love – love of God, love of God’s great law of justice, and love of one’s fellow man – which provides the desire to promote true justice among mankind.  In order to eliminate depravity of society it was necessary to respect this natural order and to love God, oneself, and one another.  If man could do this, then his ability to reason and rule would be done justly and in a benevolent manner, and he would therefore be guided by “right reason.”

In other words, Natural Law, the bedrock principle of our founding documents, states that our rights come from God and not from any government.  John Locke took the concept of Natural Law one step further and applied it to government.  According to Locke, people (not rulers or governments) are sovereign.  Individuals have sovereign rights which no government can take away.  As such, government is morally obliged to serve people, namely by protecting life, liberty, and property, and to do so with limited powers and applying the principle of checks and balances so as to be sure to government remained honest and focused or beholden to its goals. This is the bedrock principle of Locke’s view of government.  He explained that natural law tradition could be observed with the ancient Jews and that rulers, when properly constrained, would legitimately serve justly because there are moral laws that apply to everyone. (Our Founding Principles – The Beginning of the American “Experiment”; By Diane Rufino; Forloveofgodandcountry's Blog; 6/24/11)

See Also:

These thoughts on the indivisibility of America as enwrapped by the Founding Fathers’ concept of Liberty and Justice are inspired by a Determine The Networks (DTN) article that delineates the Leftist organization Indivisible.

The “Indivisible” has zero to do with the Founding Principles of America’s Founding Fathers. The Leftist organization actually promotes Big Government and is all about brainwashing people to accept government as the arbiter of all that is good for society as opposed to the government deriving its power under the Consent of the Governed.

We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness. — That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, — That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness. 

(Bold Emphasis Mine)

The Leftist Indivisible would rewrite the Declaration to read, “Governments are instituted by Men to enforce power over the governed for the good of society defined by Men.”

The DTN article exposing Indivisible as a Leftist organization fails to notify its readers that Indivisible is a part of George Soros funded network that exists to bring a fundamental Marxist transformation not only in America but globally.

Breitbart has the line of connection that stretches to Barack Obama and George Soros. My guess on the lack of DTN reporting on connections might be due to the Leftist accusation of Conservatives disseminating Fake News. Breitbart demonstrates that the Fake News is really coming from Left oriented Politico.

Obama’s Organizing for Action Partners with Soros-Linked ‘Indivisible’ to Disrupt Trump’s Agenda

Organizing for Action, the activist group that morphed from Barack Obama’s first presidential campaign, has partnered with the newly-formed Indivisible Project for “online trainings” on how to protest President Donald Trump’s agenda.

Last week, Breitbart News extensively reported that Indivisible leaders are openly associated with groups financed by billionaire George Soros.

Politico earlier this month profiled Indivisible in an article titled, “Inside the protest movement that has Republicans reeling.”  The news agency not only left out the Soros links, but failed to note that the organizations cited in its article as helping to amplify Indivisible’s message are either financed directly by Soros or have close ties to groups funded by the billionaire, as Breitbart News documented.

Organizing for Action (OFA) is a so-called community organizing project that sprung from Obama’s 2012 campaign organization, Organizing for America, becoming a nonprofit described by the Washington Post as “advocate[ing] for the president’s policies.”

Paul Sperry, writing at the New York Post, relates:

The manual, published with OFA partner “Indivisible,” advises protesters to go into halls quietly so as not to raise alarms, and “grab seats at the front of the room but do not all sit together.” Rather, spread out in pairs to make it seem like the whole room opposes the Republican host’s positions. “This will help reinforce the impression of broad consensus.” It also urges them to ask “hostile” questions — while keeping “a firm hold on the mic” — and loudly boo the the GOP politician if he isn’t “giving you real answers.”

“Express your concern [to the event’s hosts] they are giving a platform to pro-Trump authoritarianism, racism, and corruption,” it says.

“Even the safest [Republican] will be deeply alarmed by signs of organized opposition,” the document states, “because these actions create the impression that they’re not connected to their district and not listening to their constituents.”

Sperry reported OFA “plans to stage 400 rallies across 42 states this year to attack Trump and Republicans over ObamaCare’s repeal.”

Meanwhile, earlier this month, Politico profiled Indivisible and reported that “conservatives” are “spreading unfounded rumors” that the group is “being driven by wealthy donors like George Soros.”

Politico, however, seemingly failed to do even the most minimal research on the Indivisible leaders cited in the news outlet’s own profile.  Some of those personalities are openly associated with groups financed by Soros.

Politico further failed to note that the organizations cited in its article as helping to amplify Indivisible’s message are either financed directly by Soros or have close ties to groups funded by the billionaire.

While “Indivisible” has yet to disclose its donors, Politico failed to inform readers that the National Immigration Law Center where the news outlet reported Padilla serves as an analyst is financed by Soros’s Open Society Foundations. The Center has received numerous Open Society grants earmarked for general support.

Also unmentioned by Politico is that Padilla previously served as an immigration policy consultant at the radical National Council of La Raza. Soros is a major La Raza donor.

Politico went on to detail how Indivisible has been aided by and the ACLU.  The news website failed to tell readers that and the ACLU are both financed by Soros, a relevant tidbit given Politico’s claim about “unfounded rumors” that Indivisibles’ success was being driven by Soros.

The news website reported:

READ ENTIRETY (Obama’s Organizing for Action Partners with Soros-Linked ‘Indivisible’ to Disrupt Trump’s Agenda; By AARON KLEIN; Breitbart Big Government; 2/19/17)

Just as a side bar. Do you recall how the Left went crazy when then candidate Donald Trump accused the Judge in the civil suit against Trump University of having a judicial bias against him? That Judge’s name is Gonzalo Curiel and he is a member of what Hispanic organization? That organization is called La Raza which translated means The Race. If you notice in the quote above, George Soros is a funder of La Raza.

See Also:

End of Side Bar

I suspect as more data becomes documented on Indivisible, DTN will update its profile. Until then here is the DTN article of one of organizers of disruption and anarchy pushed by Barack Obama and George Soros.

JRH 2/23/17

Indivisible is an organization that seeks to persuade Americans – particularly young people – to believe that big, centralized government can benefit society in a multitude of ways that the private sector cannot. In short, Indivisible's objective is to “energiz[e] and infor[m] Americans about government’s potential” to ensure “a safe, healthy, just and prosperous future” for all. Asserting that “too much time is taken up debating big government versus small government,” Indivisible contends that “what we need to be discussing is how our government works well,” and why it is indispensable for “accomplishing big things.”

In an effort to “inspire a cultural shift in how Americans think about the role of government in America,” Indivisible is committed to “disrupting and reframing negative media discourse about government,” “creating a network of champions to change the conversation about government in their communities,” and “training the next generation of civic-minded leaders.” Toward these ends, the organization has created an Indivisible Institute that administers a leadership-development program for young people “who share a passion for reclaiming government as our unique tool for addressing tomorrow’s challenges and opportunities.” These “emerging leaders” are taught how “to help ... build a new American culture” wherein “the potential and promise of government” is axiomatic.

One of Indivisible's major projects is its “Pave the Way” video contest, whose name derives from the notion that government is “literally paving our way with road construction and interstates.” This contest offers cash prizes to young people who produce quality videos of interviews wherein small-business owners tell “how government paved the way for their business’ success” by means of things like the GI Bill, the Affordable Care Act, Small Business Administration loan programs, and infrastructure spending.

Another key initiative of Indivisible is its “I Love My” program, which offers information and talking points designed to highlight the many benefits of government. On the premise that “it’s amazing how much government is doing behind the scenes to make our lives better every day,” Indivisible argues that the media should make a special effort to “show [that] our public systems and structures [are] usually so well run that we don’t notice them at all.” One such structure, says Indivisible, is the U.S. Postal Service, which “makes our businesses better,” “helps our communities function,” “makes our democracy work,” and “is the reason our country works at all.”

Similarly, another section of the “I Love My” program teaches people to how to speak about taxes in a way that emphasizes their usefulness in helping government to serve “the common good,” rather than in a way that casts them in a negative light. “Don’t talk about taxes as a 'burden' or something from which we need 'relief,'” Indivisible advises. “These [terms] are inherently negative and they cue up the dominant thinking that taxes are bad. Instead, talk about taxes as 'loads' to be carried or shared.” Moreover, says Indivisible: “Don’t call people 'taxpayers' – it limits the conversation to only one side of the ledger (costs, not benefits). Instead, talk about people as 'residents' or 'citizens' or 'member[s] of our community' – it highlights that we are all people who both contribute to and benefit from public systems and structures.”

Indivisible's “My Take” program features interviews where “real people” are asked to articulate “their feelings [about] government” and their various interactions with it. For example, the interviewees are asked: (a) “What is your favorite thing that government does?” (b) “Who is your government hero who is not an elected official?” (c) “What thing that government does do you think would surprise most Americans?”

Indivisible's “Reality Check” program seeks to “expos[e] the reality behind myths and misunderstandings about government,” which ultimately serves as “our tool to help us solve big problems together.”

Reclaiming Government for America’s Future is an Indivisible research project consisting of reports, videos, and webinars that aim to counter the popular notion that government “is too big, intrusive, untrustworthy, and controlled by powerful elites” who have little interest in using it as “a tool for the common good.” Topos Partnership conducted this research on behalf of Indivisible, Public Works, and a number of partner organizations in Oregon, North Carolina, Nebraska, Michigan, Arkansas, and Colorado. The overarching objective of the project is to spell out ways in which progressives can effectively “shift conversations and begin to change the cultural common sense about government.” 

Leftist Indivisible is NOT American Indivisible
John R. Houk
© February 23, 2017

Copyright 2003-2015:  

About DTN

network, noun: 1.  An openwork fabric or structure in which cords, threads, or wires cross at regular intervals. -- American Heritage Dictionary, 4th Edition

What This Site Is About

Welcome to DiscoverTheNetworks, a project of the David Horowitz Freedom Center. This website is a "Guide to the Political Left." It identifies the individuals and organizations that make up the left, and also the institutions that fund and sustain the left; it maps the paths through which the left exerts its influence on the larger body politic; it defines the left's (often hidden) programmatic agendas; and it provides an understanding of the left's history and ideas.

The site is made up of two principal data elements along with a powerful search engine to locate and explore the information stored. The first of these elements is a database of PROFILES of individuals, groups and institutions, which can be accessed through the gray buttons on the home page, or through the DTN DIRECTORY on the navigation bar. The PROFILES provide thumbnail sketches of histories, agendas and (where significant) funding sources. The information has been culled from public records readily available on the Internet and in books and other sources whose veracity and authenticity are easily checked.

The second data element of this site consists of a library of articles, both scholarly and journalistic, which analyze the relationships disclosed in the database and the issues they raise. These articles have been entered into the database and READ THE REST