Wednesday, December 30, 2015

Grim Life for Christians in Muslim Pakistan

Christian Pakistani Victims –

I have been posting Christian Pakistani Shamim Masih (journalist and Christian Human Rights activist) for years. Shamim paints a grim picture of the persecution of Christians in Pakistan – It is quite brutal. Here is my SlantRight 2.0 Search Shamim Masih link to read just how thorough he has been. I have posted so many reports that there is a good chance the “Search” will not do justice or you will grow weary in reading the evil horrors Muslims (including so-called peaceful Moderate Muslims) have perpetuated against Christians in Pakistan.

Below I am cross posting scholar-blogger-Counterjihad Writer Raymond Ibrahim’s snapshot of what Christians have endured in Pakistan JUST in the month of October 2015. Seeing Ibrahim validation of Shamim’s reporting I encourage to send whatever amount you can to shore-up any financial Christmas efforts Shamim has accomplished. As far as I know Pakistan does not allow PayPal transactions ergo you will have to contact our Christian brother in Pakistan with his email - – for instructions OR you can use Western Union sending money with this LINK to a Western Union agent in Islamabad. Include Shamim’s phone - +92-300-642-4560. When I can spare the cash I use Western Union (Full Disclosure: My financial situation has not allowed me to be generous for quite some time, I pray someone whose financial situation is blessed enough to send Shamim any amount.)

JRH 12/30/15
Grim Life for Christians in Muslim Pakistan

Raymond Ibrahim
December 27, 2015 
Originally: Gatestone Institute

The U.S. State Department lists only nine nations as “Countries of Particular Concern” (CPC) — a designation for those nations considered to be the worst violators of religious freedom. These include governments that “engage in or tolerate” systematic, ongoing, and unspeakable violations of religious freedom.

According to many human rights activists, this list is far from complete: “the State Department has seemed unwilling to recognize the grave unspeakable abuses of religious freedom in a number of Muslim-dominated countries that the USCIRF [U.S. Commission on International Religious Freedom] considers CPCs: Egypt, Iraq, Pakistan, Syria and Tajikistan.”

Accordingly, on October 21, the USCIRF issued a press release calling on “the State Department to further expand its CPC list to reflect the severe violations occurring in other countries, such as Pakistan, which USCIRF has called the worst situation in the world for religious freedom for countries not currently designated by the U.S. government as CPCs.”

To understand why Pakistan was highlighted, consider the following 10 accounts, all of which took place in the month of October — the same month that the U.S. State Department was being urged to include Pakistan and other countries in its list.

On October 23, a deaf, married Christian woman was gang-raped by three Muslim men who broke into her home while her husband was out working. Despite her screams, no one came to help her. Although one man was arrested, rights activists say he will eventually be released.  According to Sardar Mushtaq Gill, a Pakistani lawyer and human rights activist, “Often in these cases the police take no action or, worse, side with the rapists. Christian families or witnesses are pressured to withdraw complaints.”

On October 15, eight days before the deaf Christian woman was raped, two Muslim men, both named Muhammad, who had earlier raped two teenage Christian sisters at gunpoint, were acquitted in court. Not only did a key witness change his statement after receiving a bribe, but according to the girls’ father, “The lawyer didn’t fight the case very well and with commitment. Mostly, he stayed absent from the hearings of the case during the proceedings. The lawyer didn’t even participate in the cross-questioning with the culprits in the court. … We face serious life threats from the culprits now, as they are being released from jail.”

A report from October 5 cites three separate incidents in which five young Christian girls were abducted and sexually abused: Two were kidnapped and gang-raped by a group of Muslim men; a 13-year-old Christian girl was kidnapped and raped; and two other Christian girls were abducted and abused by a group of human traffickers who forced them into prostitution.

Nabila Bibi, a Christian woman who had been engaged to a Christian man for a year and was preparing to marry him in a few weeks’ time, was abducted, forcibly converted to Islam, and then forcibly married to a Muslim man named Allah Rakha. After discovering her whereabouts, her fiancé went to the kidnapper’s home on October 15 and demanded to see her. Rakha, who had 15-20 other Muslims with him, refused, and warned the Christian that because his fiancée was now Muslim, he must never seek her out again, or else suffer “dire consequences.” The report adds that such Christian abductees “may be subjected to sexual violence, rape, forced prostitution, human trafficking and sale, or other domestic abuse or discarded from home after passing some time.”

On October 23, Sonia Bibi, a 20-year-old Christian woman, was set on fire and almost burned to death after she refused to marry a Muslim ex-boyfriend. According to the woman’s testimony, when she turned down his proposal, Latif Ahmed doused her with petrol and set her alight. Burns covered nearly half of her body.

On October 5, Saddique Azam, a Catholic teacher who was appointed headmaster at a primary school in a small village, was beaten and tortured by a group of three Muslim teachers who resented being under the authority of an “infidel.” The Muslims barged into Azam’s office and ordered him to resign. When he refused, they beat him so severely that he needed to be hospitalized.

According to an October 14 report, rights activists are concerned for the life of Asia Bibi, a Christian mother of five who has been on death row since 2010. A Muslim woman, apparently with a personal vendetta against Bibi, had accused her of speaking blasphemy against the prophet of Islam, Muhammad. “She could be killed by any inmate or even a prison guard, so we have to be careful,” said an official. Bibi was put in solitary confinement, where her health has been steadily deteriorating. “She was vomiting blood last month and having difficulty walking.”

Asia Bibi and two of her five children prior to 2010 imprisonment

An October 23 report titled, “Christians required only as sweepers,” notes that “Christians make up most of the non-Muslim minority in central Punjab and account for 1.5 per cent of the total population. Their representation in sanitation work, however, is above 80 percent.” After noting that Pakistan was named “Land of the Pure” in reference to its Muslim identity (as opposed to that of its largely Hindu neighbor, India), the report adds, “The attitude of forcing Christians into degrading occupations based on their descent continues and owes its existence to this long-entrenched dichotomy of ‘pure’ and ‘impure.'”

An October 19 report tells of a Christian family — a father, mother, and two daughters — who have been on the run since 2006. Their “crime” was that the woman, formerly a Muslim, converted to Christianity and married a Christian man. This prompted threats and attacks from Muslims, including her family:

“Jobless and desperate, they are unable to meet their own needs, as they continue to be threatened, hounded, and attacked because they want to live a Christian life and raise their children in accordance with Christ’s teachings,” notes the report. Due to the stressful experiences and unsanitary conditions they are forced to hide in, the woman has miscarried their third child. The father was shot in the leg and run over by a motorcycle. Even so, “Attempts to file a case against their tormentors have fallen on deaf police ears.”

On October 7, more than 1,000 Christians gathered in front of the Punjab Assembly to protest an “anti-minority” bill that “denies voting rights to women” and “does not allow religious minorities to elect their own representatives.” Religious minorities argued that an appointed official “cannot do anything” except to “become a puppet in the hand of their party.”

These ten accounts from October alone are a typical sampling of what Christians, who reportedly make up roughly 1% of Pakistan’s population, routinely experience. (Over 96% of Pakistan’s population is Muslim).

Worse, the majority of atrocities, according to human rights activists, never get reported for fear of reprisals. It took five years for the account of a two-year-old toddler, who was savagely raped because her Christian father refused to convert to Islam, to become public. She has undergone five surgeries and still remains disfigured. Her family lives in constant fear and in hiding.

According to human rights activist Sardar Mushtaq Gill, who is involved with many of the above-mentioned cases, “Violence against women and children of religious minorities, the weak and vulnerable, is widespread in Pakistan and is often carried out in silence. These cases and the stories do not come to light and when victims talk about it they are intimidated.”

In light of all this, it is high time for Pakistan to be labeled a “Country of Particular Concern” by the U.S. Department of State. Otherwise, the crucial question persists: Why is it not?

Online Free Speech Ensured by
Content copyright Raymond Ibrahim, you may share content from this site provided a link to the source is supplied.

About Raymond Ibrahim

RAYMOND IBRAHIM is a widely published author, public speaker, and Middle East and Islam specialist.  His books include Crucified Again: Exposing Islam’s New War on Christians (2013) and The Al Qaeda Reader (2007). His writings, translations, and observations have appeared in a variety of publications, including the New York Times, CNN, LA Times, Fox News, Financial Times, Jerusalem Post, New York Times Syndicate, United Press International, USA Today, Washington Post, Washington Times, and Weekly Standard; scholarly journals, including the Almanac of Islamism, Chronicle of Higher Education, Jane’s Islamic Affairs Analyst, Middle East Quarterly, and Middle East Review of International Affairs; and popular websites, such as American Thinker, the Blaze, Bloomberg, Breitbart, Christian Post, FrontPage Magazine, Gatestone Institute, the Inquisitr, Jihad Watch, NewsMax, National Review Online, PJ Media, the UK’s Commentator, and World Magazine. He has contributed chapters to several anthologies and been translated into dozens of languages.

Ibrahim guest lectures at universities, including the National Defense Intelligence College, briefs governmental agencies, such as U.S. Strategic Command and the Defense Intelligence Agency, provides expert testimony for Islam-related lawsuits, and has testified before Congress regarding the conceptual failures that dominate American discourse concerning Islam and the worsening plight of Egypt’s Christian Copts. Among other media, he has appeared on READ THE REST

Tuesday, December 29, 2015

Are we being Nudged to Accept a Collective System????

Hammond Family

Pseudonymous Conspiracy blogger Tony Newbill sent me a series of news articles that makes a point based on how the Hammond family was railroaded by the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) for arson wildfires and labeled as Right Wing terrorists by the Obama Administration's Department of Justice (DOJ). Newbill uses the Hammond incident to show government manipulation, societal brainwashing, Left Wing transformation against American values and let me add that Obama continues to thumb his nose at the Original Intent of the U.S. Constitution.

Just as a little background to the BLM persecution of the Hammond family here is a Freedom Outpost excerpt that holds the government accountable unlike the mainstream media going out of its to sing the Obama Administration tune:

This story has been brewing for some time, but not gotten national attention, unlike the Bundy Ranch incident in 2014. The family of Dwight Hammond have come under the tyrannical eye of the federal government and now it appears that both Hammond and his son Steve are being railroaded for something that is a non-criminal act is being played out before their eyes. Word went out to citizen militias this week that the issue is a level 2 alert, meaning that militia members across the country need to be ready to deploy to Oregon to stand against federal tyrants who are seeking to wrongfully imprison two American citizens. 
 According to an October 7, 2015 press release from the Obama Department of Justice, Dwight Lincoln Hammond, Jr., 73, and his son, Steven Dwight Hammond, 46, both residents of Diamond, Oregon in Harney County, were sentenced to five years in prison by Chief U.S. District Judge Ann Aiken for arsons they committed on federal lands. 
The men were charged nearly a decade after the first fire and five years after the second. 

 The jury in Pendleton, Oregon found the Hammonds guilty of the arsons after a two-week trial in June 2012. They were found guilty of arson on lands which they had grazing rights under Hammond Ranches, Inc., but which the unconstitutional Bureau of Land Management (BLM) is supposed to manage. The land is claimed as federal land, in clear violation of the Constitution. 
 … [U.S. District Judge Michael] Hogan did not believe the men had malicious intent to be labeled as terrorists under the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996, even though he sentenced them to jail for the time he did. 

 Both men served their sentences and were released. Now, the feds have appealed those sentences and want the mandatory minimum five-year sentence imposed on the men, and so they appealed to the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, who agreed with the feds that the judge ruled illegally. However, now they are wanting to label the Hammonds as terrorists under the 1996 law in order to put them back in jail. 
 However, what was not communicated in all of this is that the BLM starts these kinds of fires quite often and it actually benefits the land, though many times the BLM's fires get completely out of control. Second, the fires that were started were not arson. 

 Dwight's wife, Susan, said, "They called and got permission to light the fire… We usually called the interagency fire outfit – a main dispatch – to be sure someone wasn't in the way or that weather wouldn't be a problem." 
 According to the Bundy Family, they point out that the Hammonds were simply engaging in what is commonly known as prescribed fires. 
 …  The BLM also performs prescribed burns and have let it get out of control many times, but never has it cost any federal agent hundreds of thousands of dollars in fines and years of life in prison. The Hammonds prescribed a fire that moved to public land, they extinguished the fire themselves.  The courts found that the burn increased vegetation for the following years, and had a positive impact on the land.  With no authority or justification to prosecute, eleven years after the fire, federal attorneys have obtained judgment that the Hammonds are terrorists and must be punished severely for their actions." 

READ ENTIRETY (Bigger Than Bundy Ranch: Militia put on Level 2 Alert to Defend Oregon Ranchers against Tyrannical Feds Who Label Them Terrorists; By Tim Brown; Freedom Outpost; 11/24/15)

Are we being Nudged to Accept a Collective System????

Sent by Tony Newbill
Sent: 12/28/2015 12:15 AM

In this Video the BLM sets fires and BURNS Cattle!!!!!

VIDEO: BLM Destroying Ranches by Fire [Blog Editor: For my fellow Christians this is a profanity alert by some very upset Ranchers.]

Posted by Ammon Bundy 
Published on Dec 5, 2015 
 This BLM fire reportedly killed more than 80 head of cattle. Put ranchers trying to save their cattle in extreme danger, injured other cattle, burnt homes and structures, burnt fences and power poles and threatened the town of Frenchglen.

BLM Burns Ranches and Destroys Cattle, but Ranchers Get Charged with Terrorism 
 I previously reported on the Hammond family, a family of ranchers in Oregon whose two patriarchs are being targeted in a government conspiracy to remove the ranchers from the land they have been on for decades. The family has been threatened by federal agents and fear for their lives. Now, the Bureau of Land Management is doing the very thing that the Hammonds did, which is burn off some of the land, only in the case of the BLM, they have killed more than 80 head of cattle, endangered the ranchers, injured other cattle, burnt homes and other structures such as fences and power poles and threatened an entire town! Yet, it is ranchers who are considered terrorists by the feds, not the BLM. 
 Ammon Bundy recently spoke out on the injustices and criminal activity of the BLM against the Hammond family. 
 Bundy claims that there was no due process, something that is specifically supposed to be protected under the Fifth Amendment of the US Constitution, and he went on to state that there was a tremendous amount of corruption involved in the sentencing, the re-sentencing and even in the present situation. 
 Bundy claims that he has confirmed that the Sheriff's Office has been providing information to the FBI on the Hammonds and others, including Bundy and his family. He has also confirmed that the threats that the Hammond family received came from the US Attorney's office. In fact, Bundy said that the threats claimed that if the Hammonds didn't break off communication with Ammon Bundy, they would be detained early and incarcerated in a "less desirable prison." 
 Bundy then went on to show a video of the BLM starting prescribed fires in July, something that normally doesn't take place at that time as the animals the ranchers care for are usually eating the very grass that the BLM set on fire. However, the video shows that the BLM didn't just burn grass. It killed and injured cattle, burned homes and destroyed other property. The video of land burning by BLM picks up around the 3:10 mark below. … [Blog Editor: The video referenced is from above.] 
 Not only did they start the fires, but as the video shows, there was no one tending to the fires at various times. Not only that, but as ranchers attempted to make a fire break with water trucks and equipment, the BLM agents were building a fire around them! In fact, video captured BLM agents lighting fires within 100 feet of the corrals and those taking the video! Talk about deliberate terrorist acts! 
 But the BLM won't be held accountable for their actions. No sir. It's the READ ENTIRETY Former US Marine Put on Terror Watch List, Held At Gunpoint – Was it because he is helping the Oregon Ranchers? 
 This past week, radio show host and former US Marine Pete Santilli and his co-host Debra Jordan were arrested at gunpoint as they prepared for a trip out West to aid and cover the ongoing tyrannical saga involving the Hammonds, a ranching family that the government has targeted as terrorists and is planning to imprison the men of the family in January. 
 Santilli has been covering the Hammond Ranch family out in Oregon, who in a matter of weeks will be seeing the federal government engage in what amounts to double jeopardy against two men of their family. For a background on the Hammond story, click herehere and here. 
 Then witness video evidence of the Bureau of Land Management doing the exact same things the Hammonds are accused of without penalty. 
 In an exclusive interview with Freedom Outpost, Santilli told us that he was arrested last week. In the initial arrest, the policeman, who happens to be the Chief of Police for Newtown, Ohio, Thomas Synan, Jr. claimed the Santilli was impeding traffic, though that seems contradictory to how he put the two radio hosts under arrest, claiming that Santilli's name and his vehicle was on the terror watchlist. 
 In a recording provided to Freedom Outpost by Santilli, you can hear Police Chief Synan claim that Santilli was impeding traffic by using his phone. Then he claims that Santilli was not wearing his seatbelt. According to Santilli, none of that was true. He had been using his electronic vapor and had merely picked up his cell phone to turn on recording once Sanyn [sic] began to pull him over. READ THE REST (Former US Marine Put on Terror Watch List, Held At Gunpoint – Was it because he is helping the Oregon Ranchers? By Tim Brown; D.C. Clothesline; 12/26/15)

Posted by Pete Santilli Show 
Published on Dec 1, 2015 
 Listen to the full show here: Episode #1114 - FBI & Media Relentlessly Terrorizing United States Marine 


*** Sheriff David Ward has deleted his email and refused to take calls from Americans concerned about his unconstitutional stance against the Hammond Family. He has also decided to forward all emails and correspondence from Americans to the FBI. Please do your part as a Constitutional Patriot and send him a copy of his letter via U.S. Mail, fax and email: 

Sheriff David M. Ward485 N. Court Avenue #6Burns, Oregon 97720email: dave.ward@co.harney.or.usTelephone: 541-573-6156fax: 541-573-61546 
DEAR DONALD TRUMP & "DUMB-DYNASTY" MEMBERS: Contrary to what Donal[d] Trump has said; it wasn't "muslims" who were celebrating in NYC after the planes hit the towers. Please read this article: 9/11 Revisited: Declassified FBI Files Reveal New Details About 'The Jumping Israelis' 

United States Marine Jon Ritzheimer, is enduring the constant threat of FBI heavy surveillance, as well as their typical coordinated demonization of their "targets" through their coordination with the Main Stream Media. 

Jon Ritzheimer, a Phoenix based anti-Islam activist posted the expletive-ridden video on Facebook on November 18, slamming President Obama, refugees and Muslims. 

In the video, Ritzheimer held a gun and also laid into The Islamic Post, a publication of the Hancock, New York-based organization the Muslims of America. In June, it published an article that labeled Ritzheimer an 'American Taliban.' 

In response, Ritzheimer fires back: 'What's up America? Jon Ritz here with my brother Tyler, one of my old high school brother's here, and we're driving all the way across America all the way to READ THE REST

Are all these People like the Hammonds being Shoved or Nudged? There sure seems to be a Pattern across the USA on de-developing the Individual's Liberties don't you think?

Maybe the BLM is a Member of the Social and Behavioral Sciences Team?


Social and Behavioral Sciences Team

Making It All UpThe behavioral sciences scandal 
 One morning in August, the social science reporter for National Public Radio, a man named Shankar Vedantam, sounded a little shellshocked. You couldn't blame him. 
 Over 270 researchers, working as the Reproducibility Project, had gathered 100 studies from three of the most prestigious journals in the field of social psychology. Then they set about to redo the experiments and see if they could get the same results. Mostly they used the materials and methods the original researchers had used. Direct replications are seldom attempted in the social sciences, even though the ability to repeat an experiment and get the same findings is supposed to be a cornerstone of scientific knowledge. It's the way to separate real information from flukes and anomalies. 
 The researchers, Vedantam glumly told his NPR audience, "found something very disappointing. Nearly two-thirds of the experiments did not replicate, meaning that scientists repeated these studies but could not obtain the results that were found by the original research team." 
 "Disappointing" is Vedantam's word, and it was commonly heard that morning and over the following several days, as the full impact of the project's findings began to register in the world of social science. Describing the Reproducibility Project's report, other social psychologists, bloggers, and science writers tried out "alarming," "shocking," "devastating," and "depressing." 
 But in the end most of them rallied. They settled for just "surprised." Everybody was surprised that two out of three experiments in behavioral psychology have a fair chance of being worthless. 
 The most surprising thing about the Reproducibility Project, howeverthe most alarming, shocking, devastating, and depressing thingis that anybody at all was surprised. The warning bells about the feebleness of behavioral science have been clanging for many years. 
 For one thing, the "reproducibility crisis" is not unique to the social sciences, and it shouldn't be a surprise it would touch social psychology too. The widespread failure to replicate findings has afflicted physics, chemistry, geology, and other real sciences. Ten years ago a Stanford researcher named John Ioannidis published a paper called "Why Most Published Research Findings Are False." 
 "For most study designs and settings," Ioannidis wrote, "it is more likely for a research claim to be false than true." He used medical research as an example, and since then most systematic efforts at replication in his field have borne him out. His main criticism involved the misuse of statistics: He pointed out that READ ENTIRETY (Making It All Up: The behavioral sciences scandal; By ANDREW FERGUSON; Weekly Standard; 10/19/15)

There Is A New Executive Order You Really Need to Know About

Government agencies are preparing to collect more data on us thanks to a new executive order. They will use the data to "tweak" messaging and "nudge" the populace. They will use it to experiment on us. 
 Barack Obama issued an executive order Tuesday titled, Executive Order — Using Behavioral Science Insights to Better Serve the American People. Don't be fooled by the "to better serve the American people" part. He has authorized experiments on the American public. 
 The first paragraph of the order says: A growing body of evidence demonstrates that behavioral science insights — research findings from fields such as behavioral economics and psychology about how people make decisions and act on them — can be used to design government policies to better serve the American people. 
 They say they are going to use the psychology and behavioral science to create policies that serve the American people. They are also going to develop strategies with it to message Americans on issues the government has taken on. 
 Government agencies will be encouraged to collect and preserve data on everyday Americans to use for their scientific research. 
 Barack Obama is already maintaining massive databases on every American, many of them by race. 
 The use of behavioral sciences by government agencies could lead to manipulation of the masses with government propaganda. We have already seen a number of warning signs. 
 The new HUD mandate, for one, is being encouraged with commercials. 
 The mandate is officially billed as the Affirmatively Affirming Fair Housing (AFFH) rule and it was finalized this week. It requires communities that take any federal grants to identify and eliminate deviations from mandated demographic and socioeconomic ratios and quotas. 
 It's social engineering of the worst kind and it isn't popular, but READ THE REST (There Is A New Executive Order You Really Need to Know About; By S. Noble; Independent Sentinel; 9/15/15) 

Saturday, September 19, 2015

SEE:; [Blog Editor Warning: My McAfee software warned of possible site problems. I noticed some of the links transferred to another website other than listed. The questionable link in this excerpt are removed here.] 
 republished below in full unedited for informational, educational, and research purposes: 
 Prepare to be "nudged" by Obama's new "behavioral science" squads — for your own good, of course. Under the guise of better "serving" the American people through government, Obama signed an executive order this week calling for federal agencies and departments to deploy emerging "behavioral science" techniques against the public. 
 Among other goals, the expansion of federal mind manipulation is supposed to help more Americans access government welfare programs, take their "recommended" vaccines, supply more information about themselves to the federal government, and accelerate the transition toward what Obama called "a low-carbon economy." The controversial decree, signed on September 15, explicitly seeks to use "behavioral science" to prod Americans — or "nudge" them, as Obama's "regulatory czar" Cass Sunstein put it — into making "choices" that the White House considers desirable. 
 Obama celebrated his plan to manipulate the minds of Americans as a means to advance a dizzying array of his controversial agendas to fundamentally transform America. "Adopting the insights of behavioral science will help bring our government into the 21st century in a wide range of ways — from … 
 The plan to more effectively use psychological manipulation against the public will be led by none other than John Holdren, Obama's forced abortion-touting "science czar," who formerly embraced global-cooling alarmism and predicted a billion deaths from a new ice age caused by human activity. Currently embroiled in multiple scandals and lawsuits surrounding his potentially unlawful use of a private e-mail account for official business and his statements blaming "global warming" for record cold, Holdren has perhaps one of the most troubling backgrounds of any top White House official. In his 1977 book Ecoscience, for instance, Holdren and his cohorts proposed drugging the food and water supply with sterilizing agents and creating a "planetary regime" with an armed force to control resources and the abortions and medical sterilization to deal with alleged overpopulation, and much more. Now he runs Obama's White House Office of Science and Technology Policy, as well as the newly unveiled Social and Behavioral Sciences Team. 
 The first public information on Obama's plan to use psychological operations to manipulate the American people came in 2013, when a document outlining the White House's plans to create a "Behavioral Insights Team" and engage in "behavioral interventions" surfaced. The paper made clear that the purpose of manipulating the public was to "nudge" the U.S. population into thinking and behaving in ways that Obama officials deem best … READ ENTIRETY [Blog Editor Warning: My McAfee software warned of possible site problems. I noticed some of the links transferred to another website other than listed.] ("Nudge Unit", Precursor to "Shove Unit"; Rather Expose Them; 9/19/15)

Could it be that individuals that FIT the pattern set forth by the Obama Administration's terminology determining what is the greatest threat to the USA and through Executive Order has directed Government Agencies to conduct psychology and experimental behavior experiments, so an Investigation into whether or not the BLM was experimenting on a Rancher like the Hammonds to see if they could create a Right Wing extremist reaction that could be used to FIT in with the Obama Administration's Report.

ISIS is marching across huge swaths of land in the Middle East, crucifying, beheading and burning alive untold numbers of human beings, and making direct threats against the United States. 
 But the Department of Homeland Security is making sure the government doesn't take its eye off the real enemy – right-wingers. 
 CNN reports: 
 A new intelligence assessment, circulated by the Department of Homeland Security this month and reviewed by CNN, focuses on the domestic terror threat from right-wing sovereign citizen extremists. 
 The report cites "24 violent sovereign citizen-related attacks across the U.S. since 2010," or as ISIS calls it, "a slow Tuesday morning." 

Without naming names, or citing any sources, CNN declares: 
 Some federal and local law enforcement groups view the domestic terror threat from sovereign citizen groups as equal to — and in some cases greater than — the threat from foreign Islamic terror groups, such as ISIS, that garner more public attention. 
 While anyone committing crimes is an issue law enforcement should be concerned with, the threat from lunatic fringe "sovereign citizens" — people who reject government — pales in comparison to an organized and well-financed group of jihadi terrorists excited at the prospect of their own death in the course of killing "infidels." 
 A White House official said READ THE REST (Obama's DHS Report Warns Of The Real Threat To America: Right-Wingers; By Derek Hunter; Daily Caller; 02/20/2015 1:19 PM)

This from the article:  

"The program has already existed in an experimental form, but now Obama has formally established the federal "Social and Behavioral Sciences Team," ordering them to to use psychology and experimental behavior data to make government more user-friendly." READ ENTIRETY (Obama Issues Executive Order for Government Use of Behavioral Data; By CHARLIE SPIERING; Breitbart; 9/15/15)

You see I think it's all about the Ideology of Overpopulation and these Ideologues who think they need to do something about it , indulge me please …..

For 50 years the environmental movement has unsuccessfully argued that we should save the planet for moral reasons, that there were more important things than money. Ironically, it now seems it will be money -- through the economic impact of climate change and resource constraint -- that will motivate the sweeping changes necessary to avert catastrophe. 
 The reason is we have now reached a moment where four words -- the earth is full -- will define our times. This is not a philosophical statement; this is just science based in physics, chemistry and biology. There are many science-based analyses of this, but they all draw the same conclusion -- that we're living beyond our means. 
 The eminent scientists of the Global Footprint Network, for example, calculate that we need about 1.5 Earths to sustain this economy. In other words, to keep operating at our current level, we … (The Earth is full; By Paul Gilding; CNN; 4/8/12 Updated 9:39 AM ET)

Socialism and a Totalitarian Communism is how they want to control the rate of human consumption now to save earth from overpopulation.

[Blog Editor: The above link is to a Ted Talk conducted by Paul Tudor Jones II with the title of "Why We Need to Rethink Capitalism". Ted Talk videos are Left Wing Climate Change De-Population kind of agendas. Watch if you are gullible or wish to throw up.]

Earth's Population Limit Exceeded, White House Adviser Says

Nina Fedoroff, science and technology adviser to Condoleezza Rice in the last administration and now to Hillary Clinton, tells the BBC that humans have exceeded the Earth's "limits of sustainability." 
 "We need to continue to decrease the growth rate of the global population; the planet can't support many more people," Fedoroff said. Meanwhile, we need to manage water and wild land better, she said. 
 There are currently 6.77 billion of us. Some time in October 2012 we'll cross the 7 billion mark. There are 261 people born every minute. [more facts]. 
 [Read the Full Story at the BBC] (Earth's Population Limit Exceeded, White House Adviser Says; By Live Science Staff;; 3/31/09 06:42pm ET)

Fundamental Transformation is about this:

Sustainable Aotearoa NZ (SANZ) is a non-governmental organisation committed to educating society on the new ways of living we need to adopt in the face of  climate change, resource depletion, rising oil costs, world over-population and permanent global recession. These events are now upon us. 
 Our vision is to see the transformation of society as a result of these unavoidable factors into connected, global communities that live harmoniously within earth's limits. 

During remarks that she made for the 15th Anniversary of the International Conference on Population and Development, U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton announced the launch of a new program that according to Clinton will now become the centerpiece of U.S. foreign policy.  This new program is known as the Global Health Initiative, and it is being incredibly well-funded at a time when the U.S. government is drowning in debt.  According to Clinton, 63 billion dollars will be spent by the U.S. to prevent pregnancies and to improve "family planning" services around the globe over the next six years.  In other words, the new centerpiece of U.S. foreign policy is all about eugenics and population control. 
 The following is an excerpt from Clinton's remarks…. (Hillary Clinton: Population Control Will Now Become The Centerpiece Of U.S. Foreign Policy; Posted by Michael;; 2/1/10)

Population is a complicated topic. With the worldwide population slated to top 7 billion in 2011, we decided it was one we needed to tackle. But we wanted to do it in a way that gives readers room to think. We spread out our coverage over a year, with articles that take deep dives into specific issues—demographics, food security, climate change, fertility trends, managing biodiversity— that relate to global population. Our reporting is collected here. Feel free to explore and share your thoughts on twitter at #7billion. 
 National Geographic presents 7 Billion: How your world will change, a compilation of the acclaimed year-long editorial series about population, plus award-winning videos, fresh insights, and stunning new photos. (Are there too many people on the planet? National Geographic) 

The two most important commodities known to man both face severe supply issues in the immediate future, oil and water. 
 The world peaked in oil discoveries in 1964, a year that saw nearly 500 billion barrels of oil discovered, in 2011, it had fallen to below 100 billion barrels. Of the world's four super-giant oil fields, three are officially in decline: Mexico's Cantarell, Russia's Samotlor, and Kuwait's Burgan. The fourth is also in decline, however Saudi Arabia officially denies these claims but we know through Wiki-Leaks that this is indeed the case. We also know through history that all oil fields do peak in production, it is also evident in nation states. For example, the U.S. peaked in discoveries in 1930, 40 years later the U.S. peaked in production at 11.3 million barrels per day. Today we average less than 8 million barrels per day. Despite all of our new technologies, we … 
 The access to clean drinking water is also a crisis that is a matter of when, not if. According to UNICEF, at least 2.6 billion people lack adequate sanitation, while 1.1 billion people live without clean drinking water period. Water is the key component in all of our lives no matter where we live, not only for human use, but for energy, industry, agriculture, and livestock. is certain we will see water wars by the end of this decade, over 260 river basins are shared by two or more countries and most of these rivers are without defined legal or institutional arrangements. … 
 Our goal is to help as many people as possible become aware of the disaster we are rapidly approaching with the end of cheap resources. In our opinion, the wealth of most Americans could get wiped out during the next decade due to commodity inflation. Focusing on your real purchasing power, altering your lifestyle, and investing in the future is an opportunity that you just can't afford to miss. is … (Peak Resources Homepage; About Page)

And to make us dependent on Government and let the debt consume the free make system of capitalism here's how they did it:

Controversial White House Office of Science and Technology Director John P. Holdren told CNS News earlier this week he would use "free market" principles to implement what he called a "massive campaign" to "de-develop the United States". 
 As the "science czar", Holdren deals with a wide range of issues, including health care and global warming. 
 In a book he co-authored in 1973 with Paul and Anne Ehrlich, he wrote, "A massive campaign must be launched to restore a high-quality environment in North America and to de-develop the United States". 
 "De-development means bringing our economic system (especially patterns of consumption) into line with the realities of ecology and the global resource situation," they wrote in Human Ecology: Problems and Solutions. 
 In 1995, Holdren, Paul Ehrlich and Gretchen Daily of Stanford University declared that we all needed to "face up" to "a world of zero net physical growth" that requires people consume less. 
 The three wrote an essay entitled, "The Meaning of Sustainability" in which they announced, "We know for certain, for example, that: No form of material growth (including population growth) other than asymptotic growth is sustainable." 
 … (WH Science Czar seeks to 'de-develop the United States' using 'free market';; 9/16/10 12:51 PM MST)

So I think the Hammonds are being used as tools to Nudge the greater society in a Certain Direction.

Edited by John R. Houk
Text enclosed by brackets are by the Editor.

Compiled with commentary by Tony Newbill