DONATE

Friday, February 24, 2017

EXPOSED - New documentary reveals top Democrats collaboration with Muslim Brotherhood


WND sent a promotional email focusing on the documentary “The Enemies Within”. The promotional bundles the documentary and two books: See Something, Say Nothing (Hardcover), and Stealth Invasion (Hardcover) by Philip Haney.

I am not a WND salesman however every so a WND promotion arrives in which the description in itself is informative. This one of those cases. The bundle relates to the government conspiracy under Obama’s Manchurian Candidate Administration how Marxism and Jihadi Muslims team up to take down the American nation and culture down from within.

JRH 2/24/17
****************
EXPOSED - New documentary reveals top Democrats collaboration with Muslim Brotherhood
Founding member of Department Homeland Security warns ties 'deeper, broader, wider' than Huma Abedin's

Sent by WND
Sent February 23, 2017 at 9:00 AM

A blockbuster new documentary asserts there is a master plan to create a permanent liberal majority in American by flooding it with millions of voters hostile to conservatism.

But "The Enemies Within" also claims forces dedicated to the destruction of this country have even penetrated the national security bureaucracy, endangering Americans and the entire system of constitutional government.

Key to this case is the testimony of Philip Haney, a founding member of the Department of Homeland Security and a counter-terrorism analyst who was widely praised and commended by his superiors throughout his distinguished career.

By accumulating vast amounts of data and examining the relationships between various extremist groups and their sources of funding, Haney had identified dozens of terrorists throughout the years, arguably preventing numerous attacks.

However, in 2009, it was Haney himself who was targeted by his own government. He tells his story in the book "See Something, Say Nothing," but his story is also the most powerful part of "The Enemies Within."

He recounts in "The Enemies Within:" "I finished a case up, I put it in the system. There were 67 records related to the case, individuals and organizations. But then about two weeks after I put the case into the system, I went on vacation and received a call from my colleague. He said they had removed the records from the system. They didn't just modify them, they completely obliterated them, took all of them out."

Haney argues this dramatic action had devastating consequences for the American people. The specific records the government deleted turned out to be directly relevant to terrorist attacks that took place later.

"Those are the records related to the network of mosques and organizations operating in the United States that is linked to the San Bernardino shooting and to the Orlando shooting," he recalled.

Indeed, Haney states in the video the federal government not only removed the records but actually investigated him for simply doing his job. "They said essentially that I did not have the authority to put those records into the system, even though I had been commended by the National Targeting Center for finding 300 terrorists," Haney says in the film. "So, essentially, the last three years of my career, I was under investigation by three different government agencies, all at the same time. They essentially determined that I was more of a threat than these terrorist groups."

Shockingly, the distinguished counter-terrorism expert says no one in the federal government ever claimed his records were inaccurate or untrue. The facts, he claims, were beyond dispute. Instead, for no good reason he can identify, his work was eliminated and he was disgraced.

In one of the most dramatic moments of the film, Haney describes his reaction as feeling "infuriated and stripped naked." He describes the painful experience as a "public humiliation."

"To sequester me in a small room for the last 11 months of my career with no assigned duties and then have the audacity to say those were not adverse actions because 'we're just conducting an investigation," Haney remembers. "It's cruel to do that to a person. It wasn't a moral infraction, it wasn't refusal to obey orders, it wasn't some crime that I committed. It was simply doing the job that I took a vow to do and had been recognized and awarded for."

For that reason, Haney emphatically states in the documentary the United States has enemies within its own government.

Distinguished author and researcher Trevor Loudon describes the terrifying full extent of this hostile network operating within America's own borders in "The Enemies Within," detailing an alliance between radical Marxists and Islamic extremists that has penetrated the very highest levels of the federal government. As Haney explains in the film, the problem has gotten so bad, many of America's politicians and policy makers would not be able to pass the kind of basic security checks required of even entry level employees.




"If you have overt ties to associations with known associations with terrorism, you cannot pass a background check," Haney says in the film.

He describes Hillary Clinton as a "domestic threat" and details the deep connections between the former Democratic presidential nominee and secretary of state with some of the most dangerous Islamic movements in the world. They even go beyond her close relationship with longtime aide and confidante Huma Abedin.

The most dangerous enemy is the one who operates from within your own gates. Discover the traitors within our own country and help spread the word about how America is already under attack. Don't miss “The Enemies Within" available now in the WND Superstore. "Hillary Clinton's ties are a lot deeper, broader and wider than Huma Abedin," Haney says. "The best example of her ties is her affiliation with the Istanbul Process and, in particular, with U.N. Resolution 1618. That resolution, it essentially criminalizes defamation of Islam, has been backed for 10 years by the Organization of the Islamic Conference, a 57-nation organization. It is essentially run in its leadership positions by members of the Muslim Brotherhood. By endorsing U.N. Resolution 16/18, by default Hillary Clinton is aiding and abetting the Muslim Brotherhood on a macro, global level." And the Muslim Brotherhood, in Haney's opinion as a national security professional, is directly responsible for sponsoring terrorism. He argues in "The Enemies Within" the organization should be labeled a terrorist group and shut down.

"Since we already know that Muslim Brotherhood is the parent of Hamas and that these organizations are overtly supporting Hamas and other like-minded organizations around the world then we should shut those organizations," he declares in the film. "And that would send a shockwave throughout the pro-Shariah, pro-jihadist Islamic world without firing a single shot or dropping a bomb anywhere in the world."

Until that happens, Haney argues, national security professionals have been "completely blindfolded and handcuffed." "We can't use the most basic fundamental language that they themselves use to help us understand what Islam believes and what its intentions are," he explains in the movie.

"The Enemies Within" doesn't just analyze radical Islam. Instead, it details the terrifying extent to which far left radicals who have overtly declared their anti-American intentions are taking control of the very institutions meant to protect Americans.

At a time when the mainstream media is suddenly concerned about supposed Russian interference, "The Enemies Within" shows the rot set in much sooner than the last election cycle and involves hostile foreign actors more malevolent than Vladimir Putin.

"Those of us who took our oath [seriously] are being betrayed," Haney says of his fellow national security professionals in the film. "Things like that which happened to me will happen more and more often because people will be forced to stand up for the law at the risk of their career and maybe even their life."

At a time of crisis, remaining uninformed isn't just dangerous, it's deadly. "The Enemies Within" is the first step to recognizing where the threat is coming from.

The most dangerous enemy is the one who operates from within your own gates. Discover the traitors within our own country and help spread the word about how America is already under attack. Don't miss "The Enemies Within" available now in the WND Superstore.
++++
Blog Editor: I found a Youtube video that bills itself as the documentary “The Enemies Within”. The video is narrated by Trevor Loudon as the first WND link in the promotion. However, the length  of the video is 5:41:39. That seems a bit lengthy to me thus I am unsure if it is the same documentary promoted by the WND Superstore.
***

Posted by 2414985
Published on Dec 23, 2016

No Description
____________________
Call Toll-Free to Order:

If you prefer to order by phone, you can call our friendly, Midwestern customer service reps toll-free at 1-800-4WND-COM 
(1-800-496-3266),
Monday-Friday, 9am-5pm Central.

WND | 2020 Pennsylvania Ave NW, #351 | Washington, DC 20006

Copyright 1997-2017 WND.com Inc. All Rights Reserved.

Thursday, February 23, 2017

Leftist Indivisible is NOT American Indivisible


John R. Houk
© February 23, 2017

What is the definition of indivisible?

American Heritage Dictionary via TheFreeDictionary.com

1. Incapable of undergoing division.

2. Mathematics Incapable of being divided without a remainder: The number15 is indivisible by 7.

The Patriotism of the word indivisible:


I pledge allegiance to the Flag,
of the United States of America
and to the Republic for which it stands,
One Nation, under God
Indivisible, with Liberty and Justice for All.

The notion behind The Pledge I’d like to point to is this: America is ONE nation as in ONE culture with parts that cannot undergo division as long as Liberty and Justice is insured to ALL.

The essence of “indivisible” for Americans is wrapped in the American concept Liberty and Justice. The true “American” concept is vastly different than the American Left’s concept of Liberty and Justice.

Liberty:

Liberty and virtue are not a likely pair. At first sight they seem to be contraries, for liberty appears to mean living as you please and virtue appears to mean living not as you please but as you ought. It doesn’t seem likely that a society dedicated to liberty could make much of virtue, nor that one resolved to have virtue could pride itself on liberty. Yet liberty and virtue also seem necessary to each other. A free people, with greater opportunity to misbehave than a people in shackles, needs the guidance of an inner force to replace the lack of external restraint. And virtue cannot come from within, or truly be virtue, unless it is voluntary and people are free to choose it. Americans are, and think themselves to be, a free people first of all. Whatever virtue they have, and however much, is a counterpoint to the theme of liberty. But how do they manage to make virtue and liberty harmonious? (Liberty and Virtue in the American Founding; By Harvey C. Mansfield; Hoover.org)

See Also:


Concept of Liberty; By Dictionary of American History; Encyclopedia.com; 2003)

Justice:

The philosophy of John Locke was a major influence on America’s Founding Fathers (SEE ALSO: John Locke – A Philosophical Founder of America; WallBuilders; 12/29/16). The influence of Locke’s concept of Natural Law is embodied in these two paragraphs:

In short, according to Cicero, the only intelligent approach to government, justice and human relations is in terms of the laws which the Supreme Creator had already established. The Founders took from Cicero an idea that was revolutionary in terms of a governing a body and that idea was that the glue which binds human beings together in any commonwealth of a just society is love – love of God, love of God’s great law of justice, and love of one’s fellow man – which provides the desire to promote true justice among mankind.  In order to eliminate depravity of society it was necessary to respect this natural order and to love God, oneself, and one another.  If man could do this, then his ability to reason and rule would be done justly and in a benevolent manner, and he would therefore be guided by “right reason.”

In other words, Natural Law, the bedrock principle of our founding documents, states that our rights come from God and not from any government.  John Locke took the concept of Natural Law one step further and applied it to government.  According to Locke, people (not rulers or governments) are sovereign.  Individuals have sovereign rights which no government can take away.  As such, government is morally obliged to serve people, namely by protecting life, liberty, and property, and to do so with limited powers and applying the principle of checks and balances so as to be sure to government remained honest and focused or beholden to its goals. This is the bedrock principle of Locke’s view of government.  He explained that natural law tradition could be observed with the ancient Jews and that rulers, when properly constrained, would legitimately serve justly because there are moral laws that apply to everyone. (Our Founding Principles – The Beginning of the American “Experiment”; By Diane Rufino; Forloveofgodandcountry's Blog; 6/24/11)

See Also:


These thoughts on the indivisibility of America as enwrapped by the Founding Fathers’ concept of Liberty and Justice are inspired by a Determine The Networks (DTN) article that delineates the Leftist organization Indivisible.

The “Indivisible” has zero to do with the Founding Principles of America’s Founding Fathers. The Leftist organization actually promotes Big Government and is all about brainwashing people to accept government as the arbiter of all that is good for society as opposed to the government deriving its power under the Consent of the Governed.



We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness. — That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, — That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness. 

(Bold Emphasis Mine)

The Leftist Indivisible would rewrite the Declaration to read, “Governments are instituted by Men to enforce power over the governed for the good of society defined by Men.”

The DTN article exposing Indivisible as a Leftist organization fails to notify its readers that Indivisible is a part of George Soros funded network that exists to bring a fundamental Marxist transformation not only in America but globally.

Breitbart has the line of connection that stretches to Barack Obama and George Soros. My guess on the lack of DTN reporting on connections might be due to the Leftist accusation of Conservatives disseminating Fake News. Breitbart demonstrates that the Fake News is really coming from Left oriented Politico.

Obama’s Organizing for Action Partners with Soros-Linked ‘Indivisible’ to Disrupt Trump’s Agenda

Organizing for Action, the activist group that morphed from Barack Obama’s first presidential campaign, has partnered with the newly-formed Indivisible Project for “online trainings” on how to protest President Donald Trump’s agenda.

Last week, Breitbart News extensively reported that Indivisible leaders are openly associated with groups financed by billionaire George Soros.

Politico earlier this month profiled Indivisible in an article titled, “Inside the protest movement that has Republicans reeling.”  The news agency not only left out the Soros links, but failed to note that the organizations cited in its article as helping to amplify Indivisible’s message are either financed directly by Soros or have close ties to groups funded by the billionaire, as Breitbart News documented.

Organizing for Action (OFA) is a so-called community organizing project that sprung from Obama’s 2012 campaign organization, Organizing for America, becoming a nonprofit described by the Washington Post as “advocate[ing] for the president’s policies.”


Paul Sperry, writing at the New York Post, relates:

The manual, published with OFA partner “Indivisible,” advises protesters to go into halls quietly so as not to raise alarms, and “grab seats at the front of the room but do not all sit together.” Rather, spread out in pairs to make it seem like the whole room opposes the Republican host’s positions. “This will help reinforce the impression of broad consensus.” It also urges them to ask “hostile” questions — while keeping “a firm hold on the mic” — and loudly boo the the GOP politician if he isn’t “giving you real answers.”

“Express your concern [to the event’s hosts] they are giving a platform to pro-Trump authoritarianism, racism, and corruption,” it says.

“Even the safest [Republican] will be deeply alarmed by signs of organized opposition,” the document states, “because these actions create the impression that they’re not connected to their district and not listening to their constituents.”

Sperry reported OFA “plans to stage 400 rallies across 42 states this year to attack Trump and Republicans over ObamaCare’s repeal.”


Meanwhile, earlier this month, Politico profiled Indivisible and reported that “conservatives” are “spreading unfounded rumors” that the group is “being driven by wealthy donors like George Soros.”

Politico, however, seemingly failed to do even the most minimal research on the Indivisible leaders cited in the news outlet’s own profile.  Some of those personalities are openly associated with groups financed by Soros.

Politico further failed to note that the organizations cited in its article as helping to amplify Indivisible’s message are either financed directly by Soros or have close ties to groups funded by the billionaire.


While “Indivisible” has yet to disclose its donors, Politico failed to inform readers that the National Immigration Law Center where the news outlet reported Padilla serves as an analyst is financed by Soros’s Open Society Foundations. The Center has received numerous Open Society grants earmarked for general support.

Also unmentioned by Politico is that Padilla previously served as an immigration policy consultant at the radical National Council of La Raza. Soros is a major La Raza donor.

Politico went on to detail how Indivisible has been aided by MoveOn.org and the ACLU.  The news website failed to tell readers that MoveOn.org and the ACLU are both financed by Soros, a relevant tidbit given Politico’s claim about “unfounded rumors” that Indivisibles’ success was being driven by Soros.

The news website reported:

READ ENTIRETY (Obama’s Organizing for Action Partners with Soros-Linked ‘Indivisible’ to Disrupt Trump’s Agenda; By AARON KLEIN; Breitbart Big Government; 2/19/17)

Just as a side bar. Do you recall how the Left went crazy when then candidate Donald Trump accused the Judge in the civil suit against Trump University of having a judicial bias against him? That Judge’s name is Gonzalo Curiel and he is a member of what Hispanic organization? That organization is called La Raza which translated means The Race. If you notice in the quote above, George Soros is a funder of La Raza.

See Also:



End of Side Bar

I suspect as more data becomes documented on Indivisible, DTN will update its profile. Until then here is the DTN article of one of organizers of disruption and anarchy pushed by Barack Obama and George Soros.

JRH 2/23/17
***************
INDIVISIBLE

Indivisible is an organization that seeks to persuade Americans – particularly young people – to believe that big, centralized government can benefit society in a multitude of ways that the private sector cannot. In short, Indivisible's objective is to “energiz[e] and infor[m] Americans about government’s potential” to ensure “a safe, healthy, just and prosperous future” for all. Asserting that “too much time is taken up debating big government versus small government,” Indivisible contends that “what we need to be discussing is how our government works well,” and why it is indispensable for “accomplishing big things.”

In an effort to “inspire a cultural shift in how Americans think about the role of government in America,” Indivisible is committed to “disrupting and reframing negative media discourse about government,” “creating a network of champions to change the conversation about government in their communities,” and “training the next generation of civic-minded leaders.” Toward these ends, the organization has created an Indivisible Institute that administers a leadership-development program for young people “who share a passion for reclaiming government as our unique tool for addressing tomorrow’s challenges and opportunities.” These “emerging leaders” are taught how “to help ... build a new American culture” wherein “the potential and promise of government” is axiomatic.

One of Indivisible's major projects is its “Pave the Way” video contest, whose name derives from the notion that government is “literally paving our way with road construction and interstates.” This contest offers cash prizes to young people who produce quality videos of interviews wherein small-business owners tell “how government paved the way for their business’ success” by means of things like the GI Bill, the Affordable Care Act, Small Business Administration loan programs, and infrastructure spending.

Another key initiative of Indivisible is its “I Love My” program, which offers information and talking points designed to highlight the many benefits of government. On the premise that “it’s amazing how much government is doing behind the scenes to make our lives better every day,” Indivisible argues that the media should make a special effort to “show [that] our public systems and structures [are] usually so well run that we don’t notice them at all.” One such structure, says Indivisible, is the U.S. Postal Service, which “makes our businesses better,” “helps our communities function,” “makes our democracy work,” and “is the reason our country works at all.”

Similarly, another section of the “I Love My” program teaches people to how to speak about taxes in a way that emphasizes their usefulness in helping government to serve “the common good,” rather than in a way that casts them in a negative light. “Don’t talk about taxes as a 'burden' or something from which we need 'relief,'” Indivisible advises. “These [terms] are inherently negative and they cue up the dominant thinking that taxes are bad. Instead, talk about taxes as 'loads' to be carried or shared.” Moreover, says Indivisible: “Don’t call people 'taxpayers' – it limits the conversation to only one side of the ledger (costs, not benefits). Instead, talk about people as 'residents' or 'citizens' or 'member[s] of our community' – it highlights that we are all people who both contribute to and benefit from public systems and structures.”

Indivisible's “My Take” program features interviews where “real people” are asked to articulate “their feelings [about] government” and their various interactions with it. For example, the interviewees are asked: (a) “What is your favorite thing that government does?” (b) “Who is your government hero who is not an elected official?” (c) “What thing that government does do you think would surprise most Americans?”

Indivisible's “Reality Check” program seeks to “expos[e] the reality behind myths and misunderstandings about government,” which ultimately serves as “our tool to help us solve big problems together.”

Reclaiming Government for America’s Future is an Indivisible research project consisting of reports, videos, and webinars that aim to counter the popular notion that government “is too big, intrusive, untrustworthy, and controlled by powerful elites” who have little interest in using it as “a tool for the common good.” Topos Partnership conducted this research on behalf of Indivisible, Public Works, and a number of partner organizations in Oregon, North Carolina, Nebraska, Michigan, Arkansas, and Colorado. The overarching objective of the project is to spell out ways in which progressives can effectively “shift conversations and begin to change the cultural common sense about government.” 

__________________________
Leftist Indivisible is NOT American Indivisible
John R. Houk
© February 23, 2017
_____________________
INDIVISIBLE

Copyright 2003-2015: DiscoverTheNetworks.org  

About DTN

network, noun: 1.  An openwork fabric or structure in which cords, threads, or wires cross at regular intervals. -- American Heritage Dictionary, 4th Edition

What This Site Is About

Welcome to DiscoverTheNetworks, a project of the David Horowitz Freedom Center. This website is a "Guide to the Political Left." It identifies the individuals and organizations that make up the left, and also the institutions that fund and sustain the left; it maps the paths through which the left exerts its influence on the larger body politic; it defines the left's (often hidden) programmatic agendas; and it provides an understanding of the left's history and ideas.

The site is made up of two principal data elements along with a powerful search engine to locate and explore the information stored. The first of these elements is a database of PROFILES of individuals, groups and institutions, which can be accessed through the gray buttons on the home page, or through the DTN DIRECTORY on the navigation bar. The PROFILES provide thumbnail sketches of histories, agendas and (where significant) funding sources. The information has been culled from public records readily available on the Internet and in books and other sources whose veracity and authenticity are easily checked.

The second data element of this site consists of a library of articles, both scholarly and journalistic, which analyze the relationships disclosed in the database and the issues they raise. These articles have been entered into the database and READ THE REST


Wednesday, February 22, 2017

Faux-Conservative Homosexual

Sodomites Blinded for attempted rape of Angels




John R. Houk
© February 22, 2017

Can one be a homosexual and a supporter of Conservative Values – which does include Biblical Values – simultaneously? Personally I cannot see the consistency in homosexual alternative lifestyles and Conservative Values.

“Conservative” homosexual Milo Yiannopoulos was disinvited from UC Berkeley for being a homosexual supporter of President Trump. It took idiotic brainwashed Leftist rioting students to get Yiannopoulos cancelled. Conservatives lined up in sympathy for Yiannopoulos.

If you have ever read any of my blog posts condemning homosexuality as a moral aberration before God, you can guess I was not one of those Conservatives pouring out sympathy for Yiannopoulos over the UC Berkeley crosshairs.

19 because what may be known of God is manifest in them, for God has shown it to them.

26 For this reason God gave them up to vile passions. For even their women exchanged the natural use for what is against nature. 27 Likewise also the men, leaving the natural use of the woman, burned in their lust for one another, men with men committing what is shameful, and receiving in themselves the penalty of their error which was due. (Romans 1: 19, 26-27 NKJV)

And now the reality of Yiannopoulos unnatural affection has been exposed to include a predilection for Man/Boy attraction. This predilection is still illegal despite America’s Leftist corruption of American culture and morality.

Call me crazy, but Man/Boy crazed Milo Yiannopoulos should not be accepted as an American Conservative. Not only is he a morally reprobate homosexual but he is a pederast as well.

Heavy.com has the transcript and video of Milo endorsing pederasty. Here is a quote from the transcript portion of Milo favoring pederasty:

Milo: “Yeah, I don’t mind admitting that. I think particularly in the gay world and outside the Catholic church, if that’s where some of you want to go with this, I think in the gay world, some of the most important, enriching and incredibly life affirming, important shaping relationships very often between younger boys and older men, they can be hugely positive experiences for those young boys. They can even save those young boys, from desolation, from suicide (people talk over each other) providing they’re consensual.”

Here is the email alerting me of Milo Yiannopoulos talking about pederasty.

JRH 2/22/17
***************
There is no such thing as a “gay conservative”

By Cliff Kinkaid
Sent February 21, 2017 12:07 AM

Dear Friend of America’s Survival:

There is a major meltdown in the conservative movement, stemming from its embrace of a commentator in favor of “cross-generational” sexual relationships involving “younger boys” and “older men.” Breitbart’s Milo Yiannopoulos, a Brit, claims to be against pedophilia.

Schlapp- Milo Confirmed CPAC Tweet 2-18-17  


The controversy has resulted in a big slap in the face to Matt Schlapp, the main organizer of the Conservative Political Action Conference (CPAC), who invited this “gay conservative” Milo Yiannopoulos to the annual conservative gathering.

Pete LaBarbera and I discussed this “gay conservative” and his disgusting behavior on our recent TV show, “Gays and Trannies for Trump. He should never have been invited to CPAC, for there is no such thing as a “gay conservative.” Now Schlapp has disinvited Yiannopoulos because a recording of his comments in favor of man-boy sex has surfaced. A full transcript can be found here.


“We get hung up on this sort of child abuse stuff to the point where we are heavily policing consensual adults  In the homosexual world, particularly, some of those relationships between younger boys and older men — the sort of ‘coming of age’ relationship — those relationships in which those older men help those young boys discover who they are and give them security and safety and provide them with love and a reliable, sort of rockwhere they can’t speak to their parents.”

He says, regarding pedophilia involving Catholic priests, “But you know what? I’m grateful for Father Michael. I wouldn’t give nearly such good ****if it wasn’t for him.”

Schlapp Rescinds Milo Invite


This is what happens when the conservative movement welcomes homosexuals into its ranks. Fox News has had Milo on Tucker Carlson’s show:

Milo on Tucker Carlson


Something like this has happened before. Read my column from 2010:


CPAC has a black eye, but so does Breitbart and WND Books, which has just published a book on free speech on campus, No Campus for White Men, with an introduction from Yiannopoulos:

Milo Quote on 'No Campus for White Men’



The book is written by Scott Greer of the Daily Caller.

'No Campus for White Men’ by Scott Greer rating


FrontPageMag called him a “freedom fighter” and gave him an award:

Annie Taylor Award to Milo


His new book, titled, Dangerous, comes out in June and is published by Threshold Editions of Simon & Schuster.

Conservative groups and websites which endorsed Milo have only themselves to blame.

We deserve apologies from Matt Schlapp, Breitbart, WND, FrontPageMag, the Daily Caller, and others. What do you think?
Look for more fallout:

Washingtonian Magazine is reporting:

A senior editor at the right-wing publication [Breitbart] tells Washingtonian that “at least a half-dozen” employees are prepared to leave the company if Milo Yiannopoulos is not promptly fired. A second Breitbart source confirms this estimate. Yiannopoulos, himself a senior editor at Breitbart, was booted from his speaking slot at this week’s Conservative Political Action Convention (CPAC), following taped revelations in which he appears to endorse pedophilia.

At America’s Survival, we stand firm: there is no such thing as a “gay conservative.”

Send me your thoughts at Kincaid@comcast.net

For America's Survival, 

Cliff Kincaid, President

America's Survival Inc., www.usasurvival.org, P.O. Box 146; Owings, Maryland 20736, United States


Posted by USA Survival
Streamed live on Feb 2, 2017

Why did Trump keep Obama's executive order affirming special rights for the transgendered? How is this compatible with religious freedom and traditional values? Is there such a thing as a "gay conservative?" Who is Milo Yiannopoulos? Peter LaBarbera of Americans for Truth and LifeSiteNews.com talks about these matters with ASI TV host Cliff Kincaid.

__________________
Faux-Conservative Homosexual
John R. Houk
© February 22, 2017
_______________
There is no such thing as a “gay conservative”

About America’s Survival

America’s Survival, Inc. (ASI) is recognized as a 501 (C) 3 educational organization. ASI President Cliff Kincaid is editor of the ASI web sites www.usasurvival.org, www.stopglobaltaxes.org, and www.religiousleftexposed.com  ASI  is on Facebook and Twitter and has a YouTube channel featuring videos from ASI conferences and other events.

ASI specializes in exposing the United Nations, international organizations and extremist movements. We are currently working to re-establish committees or subcommittees to investigate internal security problems.

Office telephone: 443-964-8208


Mailing Address:

America’s Survival. Inc.
P.O. Box 146
Owings, MD 20736



Tuesday, February 21, 2017

Islam means SUBMISSION


I found this defense of Christianity on a G+ Community. The particulars of who posted what are given below less the actual video because I am more interested in the Christian defense versus the antichrist religion known as Islam.

JRH 2/21/17
************
Posted as comment to Youtube video on G+ Group Wrecking Hillary Clinton
Posted by altyria valenci

Video posted by CHRISTIAN DERON
Video Posted on Feb 11, 2017
Video Description:

STOP talking like you have read a Quran or hadith then attacking people who have. If you don't know anything about islam why try to defend it...I will tell you what you are defending out of your ignorance and feelings. You emotionally reasoning people are so annoying

February 14, 2017 [about 8:30 PM CT]
Islam means SUBMISSION

There are many religious beliefs which includes atheism, evolutionism, humanism, etc. that exclude God and those that include a god of man's making i.e. man himself, or another man, or a mythical being. Islam is a political movement wanting world domination by force/coercion/violence and a belief system of their own making and not obeying the Creator God.

Published on Aug 31, 2012


The history of Islam in Europe and how it effects us to this day. This is a history based on numbers and facts that you may not see anywhere else and explains why we may be afraid to see Islam for what it is based on its own doctrine and practice.


List of Islamist terrorist attacks

This is a dynamic list and may never be able to satisfy particular standards for completeness. You can help by expanding it with reliably sourced entries.

Terror attacks by Islamist extremists to further a perceived Islamic religious or political cause have occurred globally. The attackers have used such tactics as arson, vehicle rampage attacks, bomb threatssuicide attacks, bombings, spree shooting, stabbings, hijackings, kidnappings and beheadings. The following is a list of Islamist terrorist attacks that have received significant press coverage since 1979.


VIDEO: Allah & Muhammad had nothing to do with the Quran or Islam - Islam is founded on Lies & Deception [2:01:30]

Published on Aug 22, 2016

Jay Smith points out many interesting points that Muslims never told us.

Allah & Muhammad had nothing to do with the Quran or Islam.

The Quran and Islam was created by Abdul Malik in the 8th century who was a caliph from 685-705 - the great Arab reformer.

Abdul Malik takes and creates an Identity for Arabs.

Abdul Malik names who the prophet will be.

Abdul Malik creates the first Quran in the 8th century.

Abdul Malik Introduces the name Muslim.

Abdul Malik Introduces the name Islam.

It all begins with Abdul Malik in the 8th century. 

200 to 300 years after Muhammad's death, the Quran was made.

We have the biography of Muhammad at the 9th century.

There is no complete manuscript at all from the 7th century, they only appear in the 8th century.

70% of the Quran is borrowed writings from Jewish writings and Christian sectarians and is all agreed with western scholars.
There are no peaceful verses in the Quran.

Muhammad was never about peace. He killed, raped and robbed everywhere he READ THE REST

Posted by  Red Ice TV
Published on Aug 30, 2016



Bill differentiates between the historical Muhammad and the Muhammad of the Quran. Unbeknownst to many, Muhammad spent much of his life as a politician and jihadist, and was involved in many assassinations. He made Islam a political and monetary system.

Islam [as all others] is a manmade so-called religion circa. 632 AD for the Arabs by Arabs and isn't God's way. God was not silent for 4600 years and anyone contradicting God is not for God but is against God.

They deny Jesus as the Son of God who was crucified, resurrected, born/MADE of the Virgin and seated at the right hand of God's throne.

The Old Testament is the eyewitness narrative of God's real interaction with humanity starting with Abraham, a nomad without children, whom God approached to make the Father of all those that trust God by Faith. There're no Abrahamic religions; God isn't a Religion. The New Testament is the fulfillment of the OT. Islam is circa 632 A.D. God's creation was about 6000 years ago, Thus God has interacted with humans and unfolded His way thousands of years before Islam. Islam as a political movement seeking world domination is not truly religious in the truest sense. Islam is hiding behind religion and trying to appear as a peaceful religion. Biblically “religion” is charity work done for the orphan, widow, poor, sick etc. and not world domination by violence. God is not a RELIGION; God is a superior intelligence/being that created all that exists including languages that His creatures use. God knows what He says and has communicated with humanity in various ways as delineated in the Bible ONLY.

The Muslims know about Jesus and consider him to be a prophet of God born of Mary, accept the first 5 books of the Old Testament, and there are many accepting salvation in Jesus and becoming Christians.

Many of them are inclined toward God but are deceived by their leaders away from Jesus/Christianity with coercion and threats of death.

The Qur’an is nonsensical, the sayings of an illiterate man and not God’s word, whereas, the Bible is vindicated by Real Science and Archaeological evidence.

Taqiyya and kitman are two forms of lying to unbelievers that are permitted under certain circumstances in Islam.
Does Islam permit Muslims to lie?

Muslim scholars teach that Muslims should generally be truthful to each other, unless the purpose of lying is to "smooth over differences."

There are several forms of lying to non-believers that are permitted under certain circumstances, the best known being taqiyya. These circumstances are typically those that advance the cause of Islam - in some cases by gaining the trust of non-believers in order to draw out their vulnerability and defeat them. 


[Blog Editor: I don’t know how, but the parts with a red line in the margin are text with strike through lines on the post. Below is the missing text stricken that would have appeared after “Add:” and ended with “Hebrews 1:1” which for some reason continued unstricken with “6” which would followed “Hebrews 1:1”.]

Add:  child arranged marriage, female genital mutilation, wife beatings, polygamy, murder of Muslims converting to Christianity and much more.

And they cried aloud, and cut themselves after their manner with knives and lancets, till the blood gushed out upon them.

Jesus Christ Daily

There is no such thing as “Peaceful Islam” or “Peaceful Muslims”, They have not progressed into the modern world.

Koran 2:191 "slay the unbelievers wherever you find
them"

Koran 3:21 "Muslims must not take the infidels as friends"

Koran 5:33 "Maim and crucify the infidels if they criticize Islam"

Koran 8:12 "Terrorize and behead those who believe in scriptures other than the Koran"

Koran 8:60 “Muslims must muster all weapons to terrorize the infidels"

Koran 8:65 "The unbelievers are stupid, urge all Muslims to fight them"

Koran 9:5 "When the opportunity arises, kill the infidels wherever you find them"

Koran 9:123 "Make war on the infidels living in your neighborhood"

Koran 22:19 "Punish the unbelievers with garments of fire, hooked iron rods, boiling water, melt their skin and bellies"

Koran 47:4 "Do not hanker for peace with the infidels, behead them when you catch them".


Islam since about 632 A.D. and in accord with the demands of the koran/mohammed is responsible for about 300 million lives slaughtered in caliphates and in genocides of other faiths and those that would not convert.

About 300 Million Christians have been martyred since about 30 A.D, the first Advent of Jesus. Jesus did not and did not command anyone to take anyone's life, or to conquer the world, or to make war, or to commit any evil.

Real Christians are those that obey the commands of Jesus, just as real muslims/Islamists are those involved in murderous Jihad/Caliphates.

See these videos:





[Blog Editor: Duplicate info from above at this spot.]

Only Jesus decides who is a Christian and not you or any atheist.

A response to a Muslim:

+soror jebari As a Muslim you don't listen to Jesus and obey Jesus who was a Jew. Only those that accept Jesus as the Only Begotten Son of God have Jesus and God. All those that deny that Jesus is the Son of God are anti-Christ and are not real Jews and do not have God.

Why do you hate and kill Christians and Jews? This is what your prophet did and commanded which is against God and Jesus.

Jesus taught that the one you do the works of you are a son of. The works of Satan is to lie, kill, steal etc.

Revelation 20:4  And I saw thrones, and they sat on them, and judgment was committed to them. Then I saw the souls of those who had been beheaded for their witness to Jesus and for the word of God, who had not worshiped the beast or his image, and had not received his mark on their foreheads or on their hands. And they lived and reigned with Christ for a thousand years.

(The Saints Reign with Christ 1,000 Years)

Matthew 6:7And when you pray, do not use vain repetitions as the heathen do. For they think that they will be heard for their many words.


[Hebrews 1:1]6 God, who at various times and in various ways spoke in time past to the fathers by the prophets, 2 has in these last days spoken to us by His Son, whom He has appointed heir of all things, through whom also He made the worlds; 3 who being the brightness of His glory and the express image of His person, and upholding all things by the word of His power, when He had by Himself purged our sins, sat down at the right hand of the Majesty on high, 4 having become so much better than the angels, as He has by inheritance obtained a more excellent name than they.5 For to which of the angels did He ever say: “You are My Son, Today I have begotten You”? And again: “I will be to Him a Father, And He shall be to Me a Son”? 6 But when He again brings the firstborn into the world, He says: “Let all the angels of God worship Him.”

+soror jebari YOU HAVE NO CLUE WHAT YOU ARE TALKING ABOUT. YOUR COMMENT IS ALSO AN NON SEQUITUR. CAN YOU NOT READ WHAT I POSTED TO YOU?

Psalm 45:7 7 You [Jesus] love righteousness and hate wickedness; Therefore God, Your God, has anointed You With the oil of gladness more than Your companions.

Proverbs 30:4 Who has ascended into heaven, or descended? Who has gathered the wind in His fists? Who has bound the waters in a garment? Who has established all the ends of the earth? What is His name, and what is His Son’s name [Jesus], If you know?

Psalm 2:7 (NKJV) 7 “I will declare the decree:

The LORD [God] has said to Me (Jesus), ‘You are My Son, Today I have begotten You.

2 Samuel 7:14 (NKJV) 14 I [God] will be his Father, and he [Jesus] shall be My son. If he commits iniquity, I will chasten him with the rod of men and with the blows of the sons of men.
_____________
Edited by John R. Houk

Text enclosed by brackets are by the Editor.